Talk:Smart Moves

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

Skepticism Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skepticism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science, pseudoscience, pseudohistory and skepticism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkepticismWikipedia:WikiProject SkepticismTemplate:WikiProject SkepticismSkepticism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Notability

This page was proposed for deletion by an editor in the past.

The prod was removed by an editor who added two references, that should show the notability of this article's subject. They don't. Any book is cited, two citations does not make notability. If anybody knows of any reviews in reliable third sources, please add this info to establish notability for this book. --Crusio (talk) 22:45, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Mmm. Non-notable and pseudoscience. Not a great combination. In ictu oculi (talk) 22:45, 4 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pseudosciense

I am relatively knew to Wikipedia so I wanted too ask if there was a way to delete or drastically edit this page --Much ado about eating (talk) 02:30, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion

It's been 15 years since the last proposed deletion. It still reads as an ad and there's no indication of notability.

BlueWhale89 (talk) 16:56, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]