Jump to content

Talk:Smalls Paradise

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Things removed

[edit]

I'm the one that wrote this article, and it has been much added to and improved. But things that I think should be here have been taken out:

  • The reference I provided to a program of the Club, which documented its correct name (Smalls Paradise, not Small's or Smalls'), is gone.
  • The statement that it claimed to have the only working air conditioning in Harlem has been removed.
  • That Malcolm X and Langston Hughes hung out there has been removed.

That it was "the only integrated venue in Harlem" is too weak. It was the only one in New York City and the State of New York. In fact I can't think offhand of another one of this antiquity anywhere in the United States.

Also "subject to integration" doesn't put it right. No one was pressuring Smalls to integrate. deisenbe (talk) 17:23, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The name seems to be clearly stated. The only working air conditioning in Harlem is trivial IMO. The article mentions Malcolm X.♦ Dr. Blofeld 21:24, 11 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It sounds now like all he did there was wait tables. deisenbe (talk) 21:29, 11 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:Smalls Paradise/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Jaguar (talk · contribs) 21:17, 11 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


I should finish this tomorrow JAGUAR  21:17, 11 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You probably would anyway, but please look at the talk page. deisenbe (talk) 21:21, 11 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Initial comments

[edit]

Well done on all the work put into this, Blofeld, Rosiestep and We hope! I'll leave this on hold until all of the above are clarified. The sources look great, and I couldn't find any issues with the images. There were a few instances of informal prose, but they can easily be dealt with. JAGUAR  21:54, 11 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nice work! I think this is good to go now. JAGUAR  17:38, 12 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Cheers Jaguar, thanks for the review!♦ Dr. Blofeld 17:42, 12 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Name

[edit]

Are we sure that the place was "often erroneously called Small's Paradise and Smalls' Paradise"? A quick flick through classified ads via ProQuest results shows that it advertised itself using any of the three in the early 1940s, as "Smalls Paradise" in the early 1950s, and as "Smalls' Paradise" in the mid-1950s and into the early 1960s. Or is the argument that the typesetters got it wrong? Either way, the "erroneously" needs considerable justification, given the conflicting evidence. EddieHugh (talk) 14:13, 12 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • This is a photo of the club's marquee prior to 1955, when Ed Smalls sold to Tommy Smalls. You see no apostrophe on the sign; would believe that Ed Smalls would have spoken up if the sign was in error and not allowed it to stay "as is" for the 30 years he owned the club. We hope (talk) 14:23, 12 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • From further reading, I found that the first photo of the marquee dates from around 1928. It's shown here, along with an updated marquee from circa 1940. This was during the time Ed Smalls owned the club; if it was not correct, he made no changes to it when the stylized marquee was added. We hope (talk) 14:49, 12 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, we've established that the marquee said "Smalls" (although there's also this photo, possibly of the same place, which has "The Small's Paradise"). The equivalent outside the Blue Note has "Blue Note" and "Blue Note Jazz Club", so a sign alone can't be taken to be sufficient. We've also established that newspaper advertising for SP used all three, perhaps at different times. It's hard to justify the use of "erroneously" when the club itself appears to have used those forms. Wouldn't it be better to give an account, perhaps in a footnote, of the variations and where they appeared, as "erroneously" at the moment is an assumption? EddieHugh (talk) 15:59, 12 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • I've removed the word erroneously. This was original wording when it was started but without any citation(s) to prove that "Smalls Paradise" was the correct name of the venue. While researching the club, I've seen all three versions of the name used, even on material produced for the club. This is the back of the postcard used in the article. It was produced when Ed Smalls owned the club and was obviously produced to promote the club by the wording on the back. All 3 were used frequently. We hope (talk) 16:27, 12 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Smalls Paradise. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Question? A help request is open: yes. Replace the reason with "helped" to mark as answered.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 07:04, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The air conditioning

[edit]

Does everyone agree that the claim to have the only working air conditioning in Harlem is trivial? (See above.) We all take air conditioning for granted (in the U.S. at least). So I think it's more important than one might realize at first glance. If one lived in a tenement, on a hot summer night (and remember that New York, like all cities, is a center of heat), an air conditioned facility would be attractive. Movie theaters put up signs saying "It's cool inside!"

(If anyone shares my interest in the history of technology, these systems were using ammonia, not Freon, and were far too expensive for a typical home.) deisenbe (talk) 13:57, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]