Talk:Small Saves

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ice Hockey, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of ice hockey on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ice HockeyWikipedia:WikiProject Ice HockeyTemplate:WikiProject Ice HockeyIce Hockey

Comics: Strips / Webcomics Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.ComicsWikipedia:WikiProject ComicsTemplate:WikiProject ComicsComics

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Related work groups:
/
	This article is supported by Comic strips work group.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Webcomics.

Orphan discussion

By its nature, a sports-related, children-themed comic strip of relatively recent vintage, there will not be very many references to Small Saves at this time. However, it is now linked in all relevant categories. Dkendr (talk) 18:27, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Notability discussion

The question of notability for Wikipedia was raised. I looked over the guidelines for notability for comic strips and one criterion is distribution by independant sources. Small Saves appears in a number of newspapers (which I will try to run down and identify) and is linked through the NHL web site. I think this qualifies the strip for Wikipedia, but will have to do and add more information.

Some new references and links have been added, and there hasn't been any debate on the subject. I'm removing the notability tag and leaving the talk page as it is. Dkendr (talk) 00:26, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Peer Review

I'm afraid that if I were to stick to the letter of the law on this, under the guidelines at WP:COMICS this would still be a stub article. However, I think that with a few more sources and a little expansion (possibly covering reception or production of the comic?) this could easily get up to at least C class. Sorry I can't be more favourable at present, and do let me know idf you make any improvements on my talk page! Benny Digital ^{Speak Your Brains} 16:17, 15 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the note - Honest assessments are the best kind and never a need to apologize. I'll see what I can do to improve the article and thanks for your suggestions. Dkendr (talk) 19:50, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]