Jump to content

Talk:Slurry

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

The Slush article points here. Please add Slush as one form of Slurry (see that article for details). 85.227.226.235 (talk) 14:35, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Not a disambiguation page

[edit]

I have restored the article because it is an article, not a disambiguation page--however it may have been tagged. By my best attempt at a careful reading, the article presents some encyclopedic content on the unified concept of slurry (for example, the analysis of density & flow of a slurry). The introductory list seems to have misled some editors; it is perfectly legitimate in an article on concept X to list examples of X (and they are not dictionary definitions, by the way). In this case, X itself (slurry) seems to be a notable subject, and since this is an article (not a disambiguation page), the encyclopedic content should only be replaced with a disambiguation page missing the encyclopedic content by the same process whereby any other encyclopedia article is removed. In other words, AfD. Wareh (talk) 00:31, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Slurry. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:07, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]