Talk:Slouching Towards Bethlehem

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Books

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook

Confused comment

i dont know what the book is about??????????????????// —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.3.239.16 (talk • contribs) 02:16, August 14, 2007

Fair use rationale for Image:Didion-slouch.gif

Image:Didion-slouch.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 19:56, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was no move. Unnecessary disambiguation. JPG-GR (talk) 22:34, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Slouching Towards Bethlehem → Slouching Towards Bethlehem (book) — I'm not sure that the Didion essay collection is the primary topic for the phrase "Slouching Towards Bethlehem". If it were moved, Slouching Towards Bethlehem could become a disambiguation page with pointers towards "The Second Coming", the Joni Mitchell song, the Didion book and the Angel episode. — Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 06:58, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Survey

Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *'''Support''' or *'''Oppose''', then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.

Oppose. This is the currently the only article that could actually be called "Slouching Towards Bethlehem", with the spelling "towardS". The Angel article claims that the episode is named after this essay collection. In any case, Stats tool for August: angel episode has 1001 hits; Joni Mitchell album has 886 hits; this essay collection has 2474 hits. 128.232.1.193 (talk) 12:14, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- For what little it's worth, I've actually questioned the claim that the Angel episode is named after the Didion book, at Talk:Slouching Toward Bethlehem (Angel). It seems much more likely to me that both are derived independently from "The Second Coming". But that's a minor point. —Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 19:55, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion

Any additional comments:

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.