Talk:Slim John

BBC Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject BBC, an attempt to better organise information in articles related to the BBC. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join us as a member. You can also visit the BBC Portal.BBCWikipedia:WikiProject BBCTemplate:WikiProject BBCBBC articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tasks for WikiProject BBC:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Improve BBC, BBC News (TV channel) and BBC News to Good Article status following previous reviews, create BBC Computer Literacy Project (in light of forthcoming 30th anniversary)
Cleanup : Chucklevision - references and general clean-up, Pebble Mill Studios - over-detailed and long, BBC World Service Television - unreferenced and confusing
Copyedit : BBC News, Broadcasting House
Expand : Top 20 start-class BBC articles with most importance: BBC Japan, BBC World Service Television, BBC Lifestyle, BBC Two Northern Ireland
NPOV : Criticism of the BBC (See comments)
Stubs : Stub-Class BBC articles
Other : *Restructure the category
- Add infoboxes to the BBC articles without infoboxes
- Add free-use images to biographical articles where possible
- Add references to Goa Mix (see assessment) and Coat of arms of the BBC
- Return Dad's Army to a Good article. (See comments)
- Reassess BBC following improvements to article.

Plagiarism?

The text of this article is identical with this one: http://www.nationmaster.com/encyclopedia/Slim-John —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.218.41.190 (talk) 20:09, 17 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I am the author of the text and I can tell you that I wrote it myself. So if there is plagiarism it is not in the direction you think. Check the dates. Hektor (talk) 21:49, 17 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
But... I never indicated a direction of suspected plagiarism. Congratulations on your good work! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.218.41.190 (talk) 15:13, 18 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]