A fact from Sleep state misperception appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 2 September 2010 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physiology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physiology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysiologyWikipedia:WikiProject PhysiologyTemplate:WikiProject PhysiologyPhysiology articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
I removed the improper EEG image before. I noticed it was an EEG showing an epileptic seizure (simply because I came to this from such pages... you know how browsing Wikipedia goes!). I've seen a few other EEGs on highlighting particulars of sleep - I'm sure there is a better one but I couldn't find one that didn't have hilighting etc all over it.
I couldn't get to the original New Scientist article online as it's one of those subscription only things. Still I tracked down a copy of the relevant article at a library, it's one of those obsolete things with printed paper. I can confirm that the text in the New Scientist article is the same as the Wikipedia quote except where sections cut out are clearly shown. I've given a citation to the New Scientist article so anyone with access to back issues of the New Scientist can check this too and I removed the {{fact}} tag. Proxima Centauri (talk) 11:04, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your contributions to the Sleep state misperception. Yours is the first major expansion of the text I've seen since when I first wrote the article 4 years ago. However, I suspect your source may be exaggerating the actual situation, as journalists tend to do. Whenever possible, try to cite peer-reviewed journal articles or professional text as per WP:Reliable. Reading the article, the information seems to match to two articles in Sleep as sources: Perlis's article and Krystal's research. (Note: You can actually download the full text of Perlis by clicking on the "PDF/Print" tab even if it doesn't say full text.) Could you try to replace the NewScientist quotation with citations from those articles (or any other ones)? I would do it myself but my plate is full.. thanks! :) —CodeHydro20:36, 9 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]