Talk:Skyflash

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	Weaponry task force

Picture

Should we really put a picture of RIM-7 on the page? I mean, sure, they look the same, but they aren't the same thing, and would only confuse people. If we don't have a picture of it, then we shouldn't even put one. --Steven 00:19, 13 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

AMRAAM

The final section of this article seems to be more about the AMRAAM than the Skyflash. Wouldn't it be better to just say that Skyflash is being replaced by AMRAAM and include a link?

Well, I wanted to give a one-sentence reason just why Skyflash was being replaced. Nowhere in the AMRAAM article is that addressed.