Talk:Sky Pool, London
Appearance
Sky Pool, London has been listed as one of the Art and architecture good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: October 27, 2021. (Reviewed version). |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Sky Pool, London article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
A fact from Sky Pool, London appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 19 November 2021 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Did you know nomination
[edit]- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk) 02:16, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
( )
- ... that the Sky Pool (pictured) is the world's first floating swimming pool? Source: https://www.architecturaldigest.com/story/sky-pool
- ALT1: ... that the Sky Pool (pictured) is both a swimming pool and a bridge between two apartment buildings? Source: https://www.cnbc.com/2021/04/28/worlds-first-floating-sky-pool-to-open-in-london-in-may.html
- Comment: Very interesting pool. All due credit to the author and others who brought this up to GA status.
Improved to Good Article status by No Swan So Fine (talk). Nominated by Heythereimaguy (talk) at 12:36, 28 October 2021 (UTC).
- Awaiting QPQ. Its interesting and the image is essential. It has lots of refs and the whole thing is long enough (its a GA). Its neutral balancing the cool engineering with the anger of critics. hook is long enough and its hooky. Earwig identifies a lot (47%) of copied text but these are nearly all short and credited quotations. I would have chosen one of these as the basis of a hook e.g. a jewel out of reach of nearly everyone, but there is not shortage of hook material here. Ping me when the QPQ is done. Victuallers (talk) 14:46, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
- @Victuallers: Please note that since I have less than 5 credits (see here), I am exempt from QPQ (see rule 5). Heythereimaguy (talk) 16:12, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks @Heythereimaguy:, I always thought it was the main author. VERY pleased newbies are exempt even if "only" nomming. Well done. Victuallers (talk) 20:57, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
Open to the public?
[edit]It would be interesting to add to the article whether the pool is open to the public. 2A02:A45F:BF57:1:98D3:8F3A:93E5:65C8 (talk) 13:06, 21 August 2022 (UTC)
Categories:
- Wikipedia good articles
- Art and architecture good articles
- Wikipedia Did you know articles
- GA-Class Architecture articles
- Low-importance Architecture articles
- GA-Class London-related articles
- Low-importance London-related articles
- Wikipedia requested photographs in London
- GA-Class swimming articles
- Low-importance swimming articles