Jump to content

Talk:Skirt (song)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Number 1

[edit]

According to Billboard "Skirt" peaked at number 2 on the US Dance Charts. So, from where's the information that it was, is or will be on number 1?77.23.191.42 (talk) 18:09, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Kylie Minogue's official twitter account.--SuperHotWiki (talk) 01:24, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Single cover.

[edit]

I'm trying to find the most accurate cover art for the song, and I've seen the following versions:

Also pinging @CaliforniaDreamsFan: due to his hard work on the album recently. Thanks. TheKaphox T 10:59, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@TheKaphox: It's hard picking one isn't it? I would personally leave the current version as it is, mainly because it illustrates the single consistently without having different versions for the same format (digital download), and a similar version was used when the track first broadcasted. Also, Roc Nation (Minogue's ex-management team) and Rising Music themselves have published it as the artwork, so I just think it's fine as it is; nevertheless, thank you CaliforniaDreamsFan (talk · contribs} 23:00, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by AirshipJungleman29 (talk10:10, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Improved to Good Article status by Damian Vo (talk). Self-nominated at 05:59, 13 July 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Skirt (song); consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough

Policy compliance:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: Done.

Overall: Hi, Damian Vo, review as follows: article is new enough, long enough, neutral and plagiarism-free. However, Metro is cited a few times, which is unreliable per WP:METRO. Hook is cited and interesting. QPQ has been done. Pamzeis (talk) 05:10, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Pamzeis: I removed the source from the article as requested. Damian Vo (talk) 08:13, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you so much!! Damian Vo (talk) 14:07, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]