Talk:Skeena Watershed Conservation Coalition

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Environment

	Environment portal This environment-related article is part of the WikiProject Environment to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the environment. The aim is to write neutral and well-referenced articles on environment-related topics, as well as to ensure that environment articles are properly categorized. Read Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ and leave any messages at the project talk page.EnvironmentWikipedia:WikiProject EnvironmentTemplate:WikiProject EnvironmentEnvironment
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Canada: British Columbia / Politics Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject British Columbia.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Political parties and politicians in Canada.

Indigenous peoples of North America

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North America, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Native Americans, Indigenous peoples in Canada, and related indigenous peoples of North America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Indigenous peoples of North AmericaWikipedia:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaTemplate:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaIndigenous peoples of North America
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Energy

	Energy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnergyWikipedia:WikiProject EnergyTemplate:WikiProject Energyenergy
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Retitle to Klappan Coalbed Methane Project

non-caps, would be "Klappan coalbed methane proposal" or the like. If this article is only about the coalbed methan project and the politics around it, there is no reason for it to be titled about only one of the groups combatting it; the group article can still exist, but should cover other issues instead of only this one; the coalbed project on ht Tahltan pages and related pages including Sacred Headwaters shoudl also be migrated out of those into a proper article on the proposal. This article serves currently to further a particular agenda/account (for example, has Royal Dutch Shell contributed to it in the way that the WAtershed Coalition people clearly have?). Wikipedia shoudl not be used as a campaign platform see WP:Soapbox.Skookum1 (talk) 02:32, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Whether moved/renamed or a new standalone article is written, any article with this kind of content on it should have WP:Energy, WP:Mining and WP:Companies, probably also WP:Engineering.....Skookum1 (talk) 02:42, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Everything in the article except the lead was covered in Sacred Headwaters or Klappan Coalbed Methane Project, which I have revamped to make more NPOV. I have removed the redundant content and cited the page with the only reliable source that I could find that could be used to establish notability, the Prince George Citizen.--kelapstick (talk) 17:43, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]