Talk:Skalvians

Lithuania Mid‑importance

	Lithuania portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lithuania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Lithuania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LithuaniaWikipedia:WikiProject LithuaniaTemplate:WikiProject LithuaniaLithuania articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Russia: Demographics & ethnography Low‑importance

	Russia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the demographics and ethnography of Russia task force.

Ethnic groups Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ethnic groups, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to ethnic groups, nationalities, and other cultural identities on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ethnic groupsWikipedia:WikiProject Ethnic groupsTemplate:WikiProject Ethnic groupsEthnic groups articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Ethnic groups open tasks:

Here are some open WikiProject Ethnic groups tasks:

Meta-tasks:
- Place the {{Ethnic groups}} template on the talk page of articles within the scope of this project.
- Resolve the disparity in importance rankings among different ethnic groups
Articles about ethnic groups that currently have issues needing resolution:
Start an article:
- Wikipedia:WikiProject Ethnic groups/Article requests

Feel free to edit this list or discuss these tasks.

Languages Stub‑class Low‑importance

	Language portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Languages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of languages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LanguagesWikipedia:WikiProject LanguagesTemplate:WikiProject Languageslanguage articles
Stub	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

[Untitled]

The current name Skalvians has fewer Google hits than Scalvians. The name Scalowians should be the best though, corresponding with the (German: Schalauer). --Matthead 07:31, 9 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This does seem to be at an odd title. I wouldn't trust Google searches for this, since searches for this rarely-mentioned tribe are filled with wiki-mirrors. "Scalovians" (the people of Scalovia) would be the best title, IMO. Olessi 21:26, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The term Skalvians comes from the Lithuanian term "Skalva", which is very appropriate since the Skalvians were a Baltic tribe like the Lithuanians. It seems strangely inappropriate to try to construct a name for this tribe from the German placename.

Strange argument, Lithuanians are close to Latvians, both are baltic nations, so, should Lithuanians in WP named after Lietuvieši name? This is english Wikipedia, terms should be english.

The term "Scalovians" shows exactly 2 (count 'em) Google hits while "Scalowians" shows no non-Wikipedia hits. "Skalvians" has over 1000. Although many of these are from Wikipedia, Skalvians still outnumbers any other construct. We really shouldn't be making these names up, but rather relying on the standard name. Thanks, MapMaster 05:22, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed merger

I can't see much point on having two stubs at Scalovia and Scalovians covering almost exactly the same topic. Most ancient peoples are at the name of the people, which would suggest that, if merged, Scalovians would be a better title for the article. Any thoughts? Grutness...wha? 10:48, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose we have different articles on the topic in Lithuanian and German, so the english should also remain separate, although expansion is needed.Iulius 09:24, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]