Talk:Sizeism/Archive 1
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 |
Prejudice
It's another form of prejudice. People prejudge on any number of factors, more or less valid (skin color, religion, yes, but also brand of clothing, shoe size). What makes size especially notable? I think it *is* possible to make a good article out of this, but it needs reliable references from multiple disciplines, not uncited essay language. Piano non troppo (talk) 18:33, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
Sizism
Someone vandalized this article with some very sizist staments about basketball and health. All minorities have health issues blacks and gays are more susceptable to HIV. Women are more susceptable to breast cancer. However saying that this makes sizism valid would be much like saying that racism or sexualism or sexism was valid because these people were more susceptable to diseases on their jobs. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rainbowofpeace (talk • contribs) 04:09, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
- It wasn't vandalism. I removed part of the statement in question nonetheless for having an unreliable source. Falcon8765 (talk) 04:13, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
Sources
More sources need to be cited. However, not just sources from "fat acceptance websites" that cry out in the "fight against sizism" but sources giving credibility to so-called "sizist" beliefs, if the beliefs are true. For example, it's a fact that obese people suffer from more diseases, it's a fact that a good basketball player is typically taller than average, etc —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.230.248.22 (talk) 21:59, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
- You sound like a sizist to me. 72.152.154.26 (talk) 19:03, 22 July 2010 (UTC)
I think this page should be deleted unless at least one reliable source related to the term is added C.harrison1988 (talk) 02:13, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
I have added more reliable sources and tried to distinguish sizeism as unique in it's own right. CLStoegs (talk) 16:10, 8 May 2012 (UTC)
Untitled
Should this REALY be redirected to Fat acceptance? I mean if Sizism is about stuff like waist size, what about Anorexics? How come they're not counted? So what? Discriminating Anorexics isn't Sizism? What is it then???OsirisV 20:50, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
- Even more, Sizism could just be for being aggainst someones Height. Whilst this that redirects to Fat Acceptance should be Massism.OsirisV 14:05, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
- i agree, sizism could go either way, fat or thin. Vanhalenrulesforever 14:10, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
- I agree. Sizism doesn't always mean that there are hatred against people who are fat. Skinny people are more prone to sizism as well. Sweetfornow (talk) 18:11, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
- and you've now left a blank article. We don't keep blank articles in name space. If you feel another redirect is appropriate, then do so, if not, then you should propose the redirect for deletion. Not blank it.--Crossmr (talk) 03:30, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
- I agree. Sizism doesn't always mean that there are hatred against people who are fat. Skinny people are more prone to sizism as well. Sweetfornow (talk) 18:11, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
I have started a new page for sizism so I hope you guys will add to it as I'm new to wikipedia Rainbowofpeace 6:40, April 16, 2010 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rainbowofpeace (talk • contribs) 01:41, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
I have made some changes that hopefully will speak to the distinction of sizeism and all that it encompasses. I have also reworded some of the sections to better reflect the seriousness of sizeism. --CLStoeger (talk) 16:31, 8 May 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by CLStoegs (talk • contribs)