Talk:Siruvani River

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

India: Kerala / Tamil Nadu / Geography Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Kerala (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Tamil Nadu (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by the Indian geography workgroup (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article needs a map. Please work with the Maps workgroup, to create and add a map to this article. Once the requested map is added, remove the `map-needed` parameter.
	This article was last assessed in July 2012.

Rivers Low‑importance

	Geography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rivers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rivers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RiversWikipedia:WikiProject RiversTemplate:WikiProject RiversRiver articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Delete

Not really notable.

If you want it to stay add more information!

WILLROCKS10 (talk) 19:18, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep

Hi,

This article is perfectly acceptable to be on Wikipedia. Look how much information I've found on it after a quick 10 minute search. There's loads of information to be found on it yet. Give it a chance-After all it's a new page. That's what I always it. Some people can't be bothered to find information on pages that could be good. Just give it a chance!

Thanks, pbl1998--Pbl1998 (talk) 18:10, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you seriously want to propose an article for deletion, the talk page is not the place to do it - use a speedy deletion template if appropriate, or {{prod}} if not, but on the article page in both cases. But places, rivers, etc are generally considered notable if they verifiably exist. Better to spend energy on improving the article, rather than proposing deletion. PamD (talk) 12:33, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Talk

Hi,

I am going to revert the edits as they are irrelavent. The template you placed on the page is not needed as the page is divided into good sections already. Secondly, the 'or maybe vice-versa' is perfectly fine. As we do not know whether or not the river is named after the village, or the other way around, we need to keep it.

Thanks, --Pbl1998 (talk) 12:03, 27 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

"Or maybe vice- versa" is not good english. We do not need to keep this bad english on the page - Willrocks10 Speak to me 12:05, 27 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

On the contrary, I think it is (or maybe it is bad Latin?)!!!!! Isee no reason why you need to interfere with this article.

--Pbl1998 (talk) 12:07, 27 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]