Talk:Single rider

References

This article is lacking proper references and I'm flagging it as such: at present there is only one and it's a primary source. Ogre lawless (talk) 20:07, 12 January 2009 (UTC)

Is anyone opposed to removing the list of attractions that has a single-rider line? I don't foresee a reliable source being available for this information.FirstDrop87 (talk) 02:40, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

Industry-wide, not just Disney

Does this article need to exist in its current form? All amusement parks -- not just Disney's -- have (or had) some sort of single rider policy, including special lines for them. This article is too Disney-centric for something that is an industry practice. SpikeJones 11:50, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

I do know of other parks that have implemented Single Rider.  I know that it started as a test to get the optimial amount of people onto the Rocket Rods back in 1998, but if you know when and were other parks chose to start this system feel free to add.  LordBleen 01:10, 29 June 2006 (UTC)

It's not so much that it's an extremely Disney-centric article when other parks also have single rider lines, but that this article doesn't seem... well, encylopedic... to me. Is this page really necessary at all? SpikeJones 04:02, 29 July 2006 (UTC)

I know that Universal Studios uses single rider lines for Men In Black, Revenge of the Mummy and also Doctor Dooms Fear Fall. Therefore I think the article should be re-written to give the general concept of single rider lines and take out the list of disney rides that it uses. I might do it if there are no objections. Mark E 15:45, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

Feel free, I created the page based off what I knew in Disney Parks. LordBleen 03:55, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

Ok I added the information for the universal parks. If someone has info for other parks like six flags it would be great if they could add them.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Single rider. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141217122031/http://california.legoland.com/FAQ/parent_swap/ to http://california.legoland.com/FAQ/parent_swap/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140902170643/http://www.phantasialand.de/nl/informatie-service/voor-families to http://www.phantasialand.de/nl/informatie-service/voor-families

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:35, 13 January 2018 (UTC)