Talk:Singidunum

Serbia: Belgrade High‑importance

	Serbia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Serbia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Serbia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SerbiaWikipedia:WikiProject SerbiaTemplate:WikiProject SerbiaSerbia articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Belgrade task force (marked as high-importance).

History

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Fortifications / Balkan / European / Roman & Byzantine / Classical C‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Fortifications task force
	Balkan military history task force (c. 500–present)
	European military history task force
	Roman and Byzantine military history task force
	Classical warfare task force (c. 700 BC – c. 500 AD)

Cities

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles

Greece: Byzantine

	Greece portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Greece, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Greek history on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GreeceWikipedia:WikiProject GreeceTemplate:WikiProject GreeceGreek articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Byzantine world task force.

Foundation

It says that „The name Singidun is first attested in 279 BC.[dubious – discuss][citation needed] The name has Celtic dūn(on) "enclosure, fortress" as its second element, but possibly also Slavic word for "blue" ("siniy" in Serbian), meaning "blue Danube" ("siniy Dunav" in Serbian), after the river Danube.“ This is not possible since in 279 BC there were no Slavic population on the Balkan, or nowhere near Singidun(Beograd). --Rastapunk (talk) 14:19, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Rising from its ashes 38 times

This Serbian Chamber of Commerce site is NOT a valid source for this information about Belgrade rising from its ashes 38 times! This is a factoid which gets rehashed from site to site. We need to see a source with an actual list explaining all 38 occasions (I doubt the accuracy of this figure). 188.2.188.46 (talk) 11:26, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Alexander 007 Please alloud me some hypothetic proposals. As I saw from the site of Beograd, it reffers that possible the name Beograd came from the Thraces tribe of Sings (I had never hear this tribe). If this is true, then the most logical is that Romeans have named the City Singidunum, as the last part is clear Romean additive in toponymes. (Sing-idunum)

George

It would be useful to know more about the possibility (stated in the article, that is) that Singi may have meant "round" or "circular". Anybody? This information was added by an anonymous IP. Alexander 007 01:38, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Legend

Could you tell us more about the legend plz?

Meaning of a name "Beograd"

"The city would re-emerge later, mentioned as Beograd, a Slavic word meaning "white fortress" (due to the color of the stone it was built from)"

I changed the translation from "white city" to "white fortress". Today serbian word "grad" indeed means "city" but it was not always the case. In that time it ment only a fortress (as even today in other slavic languages e.g. Polish "gród"). Thus, for slavs, Singidunum was a "white fortress" and not a "white city" as it is being translated today... Not to mention that, after all, in VIIth century it was only a fortress not a city!:)

Nikola Dragovic

copyright

The part of the text about the preroman era is a copy of a website. Please, change this part of the article thanks. Bashar-fr 01:40, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Can you be more specific? I'm looking at the web site you mentioned: http://www.beograd.org.yu/cms/view.php?id=201172, and I'm not seeing anything that looks like copyright infringement. -- TomXP411^[Talk] 02:11, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 09:30, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Singidunum. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:26, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]