Talk:Singapore Democratic Party/Archive 1

Updating

Please continue to update this page. I am only halfway through. It seems to me that few Singaporeans are willing to edit the opposition's wiki. Is the climate of fear in Singapore really that serious?

NPOV/Unreferenced

I came across this article, and while I do not know much about politics, I find that this article seems rather bias, such as the example quote: "Chiam's election victory was all the more significant as it showed voters repudiated the People's Action Party's (PAP) arrogant and aloof style of campaigning, in which the ruling party at one time urged voters not to vote for Chiam because his O-level results were poorer than those of the PAP candidate." It appears to portray an opinion as a fact (please correct me if I'm wrong), which certainly does not conform to the NPOV policy. However, I myself am unable to improve this article much due to a lack of expertise in this area.

Furthermore, there are 7 "Citations needed", only 1 reference, and I can easily find many facts in the article which would be much more believable with citations and quotes, for example the second bolded part of the above quote. --Wonglkd 12:18, 20 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I am a Singaporean and I can confirm the above was reported in the news. I agree that "arrogant and aloof style" should be removed though. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.255.119.83 (talk • contribs)

I'm curious which PAP member said that. Anyone remembers? --Vsion 06:46, 26 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It is our dear MM Lee Kuan Yew FYI. And i also agree that "arrogant and aloof style" should be removed as it is a opinion that cannot be justified as a fact. Arrogant is defined as having pride in one's self, and aloof meaning distant emotionally or physically, and i find it hard to quantify their campaigning to the phrase suggested. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 219.75.21.203 (talk • contribs)

That Logo

Is it just me, or does that logo look like the one from Star Trek? Just H 06:33, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

SDP's affiliation & CALD website

Under [| SDP's affiliation section], is it necessary to list the name of the affilate parties around the world? Or should they be either rephrased (re-edited) or removed from the SDP wiki page? Pls advisee.
Anyway, the website named CALD or Council of Asian Liberals and Democrats(www.cald.net) is unavailable. Kimberry352 (talk) 04:58, 4 June 2010 (UTC) i think the website is cald.org. However, I don't see the link anywhere on this article. Fatyandao (talk) 07:12, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Singapore Democratic Party. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051102052400/http://singaporedemocrat.org/articleradiosdp.html to http://www.singaporedemocrat.org/articleradiosdp.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:17, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 10 external links on Singapore Democratic Party. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:53, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]