Jump to content

Talk:Simpson and Delilah

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleSimpson and Delilah has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Good topic starSimpson and Delilah is part of the The Simpsons (season 2) series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
July 31, 2008Good article nomineeListed
August 4, 2008Peer reviewReviewed
April 13, 2010Good topic candidatePromoted
Current status: Good article

Untitled

[edit]

I took off Template:Wikiquote because Wikiquote doesn't have that page. I am helping build another page dedicated to this season. --66.218.11.53 03:44, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:Simpson and Delilah/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Comments

[edit]

This is a nice article. There are some things which need to be done to improve it, I think.

  1. The lead does not summarize the episode properly. It only tells half the story.
  2. Everything in the production section should have a reference. The first sentence does not. Please make sure it's all covered.
  3. What channel was The Cosby Show on? It might be good to mention it to compare.
  4. Make sure everything in the Reception section is sourced properly.
  5. Is it worth giving Cultural references its own section?
  6. Is the picture of Karl really needed?

Just some thoughts. Howdoyouturnthison (talk) 00:27, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

(P.S. this is not actually a review - I'm a little inexperienced to be doing that yet.) Howdoyouturnthison (talk) 01:19, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
OK nevermind, Peanut4 listed me as reviewer... Howdoyouturnthison (talk) 12:26, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hi there, thanks for the review. I did not take care of your comment #1 because per WP:LEAD and WP:EPISODE. If the lead summarized the whole plot, there wouldn't be much a point of reading the plot. I added a reference (taking care of #2.) A channel may differ worldwide. It's noted that it is on FOX, so I didn't take care of your comment #3. Comment #4 is done. There should be a separate section for Cultural reference per WP:EPISODE. Lastly, the image of Karl would provide the reader(s) with a better view. In BBC's view: "[The] episode is brought to life by the superb character of Karl..." Thanks again for the review! « Milk's Favorite Cøøkie 13:58, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
You haven't said what channel the Cosby show is on. Simpsons was on Fox, but what was the Cosby show on? Howdoyouturnthison (talk) 14:03, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Whoops. Done. Thanks, « Milk's Favorite Cøøkie 14:56, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Simpson and Delilah. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:37, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]