Talk:Simmons Bank Liberty Stadium
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Simmons Bank Liberty Stadium article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future: |
Cleanup
[edit]I'm game. Why does it need cleanup? One can aruge that there is something of a pro-Memphis bias, I suppose, but why not do some editing to fix it if this is what you think, rather than just tagging it, which anyone can do and does little to improve anything.
Rlquall 21:50, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
i dont think it needs a clean up at all, nor is it pro-memphis. Its the Truth, Bud Adams is a jerk for what he did to us and this article clearly shows that. haha Barcode 02:05, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
I have cleaned up the article. I have shortened it up considerably, editing down much of the information into a more concise format. Content wasn't much changed. ToddC4176 16:05, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
There's some inaccurate information here. The reference to Autozone Park is one case, I believe it was paid for with private funds. I also edited something that I could prove as being incorrect, the statement that Crump Stadium was closer to campus than the Liberty Bowl, and I added the date that the Field Turf was installed.yakk0dotorg
WikiProject class rating
[edit]This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 08:22, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
NPOV
[edit]The entire "Legacy" section is opinion, and much of the "Future" section that precedes it is speculation. Violates NPOV. --Zpb52 (talk) 21:01, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Liberty Bowl Memorial Stadium. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100430230630/http://www.newsobserver.com/2010/04/28/456893/big-east-gets-liberty-bowl-option.html to http://www.newsobserver.com/2010/04/28/456893/big-east-gets-liberty-bowl-option.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:41, 22 December 2017 (UTC)
Streamline Moderne?
[edit]Has anybody ever said in a reputable article that the Liberty Bowl is a very late example of Streamline Moderne architecture? To me, its very appearance indicates this to be the case, but obviously that is mere opinion on my part, even though the design motifs make it a very accurate opinion, at least to my conceits. If anyone has something like this and could link to it, then it would make a very nice contribution to the quality of the article, but of course, in the absence of reliable sourcing, it would not be. 2600:1004:B14B:B650:795B:88B5:6C9F:7418 (talk) 23:46, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
[edit]The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 16:07, 2 April 2022 (UTC)