Talk:Silver Cross Tavern

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Silver Cross Tavern article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

England Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Beer: Pubs Mid‑importance

	Beer portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Beer, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Beer, Brewery, and Pub related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BeerWikipedia:WikiProject BeerTemplate:WikiProject BeerBeer
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is within the scope of the Pub task force, a task force which is currently considered to be inactive.

London Low‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Sexology and sexuality: Sex work Low‑importance

	Human sexuality portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sexology and sexuality, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of human sexuality on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Sexology and sexualityWikipedia:WikiProject Sexology and sexualityTemplate:WikiProject Sexology and sexualitySexology and sexuality
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Sex work task force (assessed as Low-importance).

A fact from Silver Cross Tavern appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 29 January 2014, and was viewed approximately 193,200 times (disclaimer) (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the Silver Cross Tavern (pictured) is the United Kingdom's only legal brothel?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2014/January. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Silver Cross Tavern.

Wikipedia

Ghost?

The Taylor Walker page says it's haunted. Surely this is worth including. Yngvadottir (talk) 00:13, 29 January 2014 (UTC).[reply]

I doubt this very much, it is a most non-descript set of buildings and has little in the way of colour and was not really a success as a pub because too small, compared to the Witherspoons opposite or the Clarence a little further along the street. It has expanded because of the tourist footfall in the vicinity. By including the adjacent Licensed restaurant at 33-35 the pub operator was able to expand the premises without having to go through a separate Licence application. Tony S 88.108.227.177 (talk) 01:10, 29 January 2014 (UTC) 88.108.227.177 (talk) 01:10, 29 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Confusing/awkward phrasing in lede

Regarding:

The building had been an establishment at that location since the thirteenth century.

Might this be better phrased? I think it's trying to say, 'buildings containing some form of establishment have existed at the current location since the thirteenth century'. Or is it actually true that the current building itself dates to the thirteenth century? Regardless, the present phrasing seems awkward and ambiguous to me.
A fellow editor, --75.188.199.98 (talk) 20:46, 18 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]