Jump to content

Talk:Siim Kabrits

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

COI tag (October 2024)

[edit]

Previous established version is totally overrun. Some parts of the article are not encyclopedia-like Estopedist1 (talk) 12:01, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Which parts? I'd be happy to improve these. Also, the previous version was overrun because it was very short and outdated (nothing after 2012 was covered). Kirjamarssal (talk) 16:11, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Kirjamarssal
  1. previous picture was better
  2. section "In December 2013, the Riigikogu passed ..." is promotional and redundant in this person's article
  3. chapter "Entrepreneurial activity" is too specific and in places promotional, e.g. too detail info about the company "Shroomwell". Maybe @Kruusamägi wants to add also something related to this discussion?
Estopedist1 (talk) 12:56, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Controversial things seem to be missing from the article raising questions about the neutrality of the article. If the things presented are cherry-picked, then the picture painted may be misleading. Ivo (talk) 13:10, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
1. Not gonna debate that. Eye of the Beholder.
2. Point taken, will revise that in the coming days.
3. Point also taken, will revise that too. Kirjamarssal (talk) 20:56, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Estopedist1 I cleaned up the article according to your proposal. I removed the "In December 2013..." part and reduced greatly the detailed description of Shroomwell. I still disagree about the photo, but if anyone wants to restore the old photo, I am not going to change it back. Is it now okay to remove the issues tag? Kirjamarssal (talk) 06:26, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Much better now. But just in case notifying the original criticizer, user:Kruusamägi. What controversial things you wanted to see, user:Kruusamägi?--Estopedist1 (talk) 16:21, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The best-known example is et:Elamislubade skandaal, where it was later identified that there is no concrete proof that he was involved in it or aware of this thing going on. And this organic apples company got under investigation about whether the claims of origin are true. Ivo (talk) 22:28, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]