Talk:Sigma SD10

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Photography

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Photography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of photography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhotographyWikipedia:WikiProject PhotographyTemplate:WikiProject PhotographyPhotography
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Removals

I just removed this from the "3rd Party Support" section, as it's completely PoV and just rude. Getting a *real* link for this instead of a little rant would be nice. If anyone thinks there's a good reason for this to be here, feel free to speak up.
- Forum support provided by one of the most elitist, unreasonable groups of users of any form of technology!

--Overand 8 July 2005 22:25 (UTC)

(S)he's back again. Removed this again, made a suggestion on the (ANON) user's talk page to try to form this into a constructive complaint, maybe make a 'pros and cons' section on the article.
- Annoying, arrogant usergroup that will not help with or admit to common camera problems.

--Overand 22:55, 9 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

some of the pros and cons could be said to be opinion..i.e. noise levels..you should post a link to sources?

(good idea, i'll try to do so.)

Digital Photography Review's coverage of the noise issue can be found here. From what I remember, the SD10's biggest problem was context; it was more expensive than a number of competing cameras, most of which were more flexible, some of which had higher resolution. Its sensor was undeniably clever but, by the time the SD10 came out, competing Bayer-type sensors had surpassed it with sheer pixel count, a state of affairs that Sigma has not subsequently been able to rectify. -Ashley Pomeroy (talk) 12:53, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

personal experience with the Forum

Concerning the Sigma forum: it is true that users (even people who own the camera )with opposing views on the technology, are called nasty names (in violation of forum rules), and are eventually removed from the forum -- because a small but vocal group of users, ("elitist" would be putting it kindly) -- organize purges against opposing views.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.12.124.130 (talk • contribs)

Forums can be nasty places; and that's more than we need to know. Let's keep it encyclopedic. Dicklyon 06:53, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sigma Photo pro 6.4.1

Software

Sigma Photo Pro

Postprozessing of RAW X3F and JPEG of all digital SIGMA cameras

Version 6.x is free Download for Windows 7+ und Mac OS ab Version 10.7 (6.3.x). Actual Version is 6.4.1 (MacOSX 10.8+, Win 7+). ^[1]

References

^ http://www.sigma-global.com/en/download/cameras/sigma-photo-pro/

Wrong raw only

Raw, high jpeg and Low jpeg possible. See German Site — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:810B:C53F:B9E8:49D5:596E:BF12:F1B0 (talk) 12:42, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[1] ttp://www.sigma-global.com/en/download/cameras/sigma-photo-pro/

[1]