Talk:Siege of Savage's Old Fields/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: MathewTownsend (talk · contribs) 17:37, 5 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I will review this article shortly. Looks good! MathewTownsend (talk) 17:37, 5 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

GA review-see WP:WIAGA for criteria (and here for what they are not)

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose: clear and concise, correct spelling and grammar:

B. Complies with MoS for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. Provides references to all sources:

B. Provides in-line citations from reliable sources where necessary:
Off line sources AGF

C. No original research:
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Main aspects are addressed:
Provides the historical setting

B. Remains focused:
Does it follow the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc:
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
Overall:
Pass or Fail:

Great article. I made a few edits which you are free to revert.[1] (Both by British and English spell checker spell "backcountry" as back country, so I changed it throughout the article.) I added some links for my own benefit so I could understand.