Jump to content

Talk:Siege of Damascus (634)/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Pyrotec (talk) 10:41, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Starting review. Pyrotec (talk) 10:41, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Initial comments

[edit]
After a quick couple of read throughs, this appears to be a reasonably-comprehensive, well-referenced article of about GA-standard. In passing, I think that the WP:Lead needs a bit of work done; but I normally leave the review of the lead until last, so I will delay any detailed comments on that until I've completed my review of the main body of the article.
I will now carry out a more detailed review. Pyrotec (talk) 20:31, 14 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Background -
  • The siege -
  • Khalid's attack & Aftermath -

These two sections are generally compliant. Pyrotec (talk) 12:49, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Overall summary

[edit]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    B. MoS compliance:
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    C. No original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    B. Focused:
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:

Congratulations on the quality of the article, its now a GA. Pyrotec (talk) 12:59, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Talk:Siege_of_Damascus_(634)/GA1&oldid=338356599"