Talk:Sidley Austin

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Illinois Low‑importance

	Illinois portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Illinois, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Illinois on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IllinoisWikipedia:WikiProject IllinoisTemplate:WikiProject IllinoisWikiProject Illinois
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Chicago Low‑importance

	Chicago portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chicago, which aims to improve all articles or pages related to Chicago or the Chicago metropolitan area.ChicagoWikipedia:WikiProject ChicagoTemplate:WikiProject ChicagoChicago
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Law

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Companies

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany

??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[U.S. News & World Report#blank|U.S. News & World Report]]
[[USA Today#blank|''USA Today'']]

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Fair use rationale for Image:Sidleylogo.jpg

Image:Sidleylogo.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 11:35, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

EEOC v. Sidley

This litigation, http://www.chicagotribune.com/business/chi-sat_sidleyoct06,0,2176591.story

recently settled, has been followed very closely among lawyers because it could open the door to a lot of regulatory expenses that the partnership structure has until now helped the legal profession avoid. I believe it warrants a place in this article. --Christofurio 18:53, 6 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sidley Austin during 9/11/01

Should this section be removed? It has been in here for nearly a year with no addition of references. I have looked for references but have been unable to find any. Any input on this? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Huh01 (talk • contribs) 13:03, 3 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nevermind, I was able to find sources after searching a bit longer. Huh01 (talk) 14:51, 3 October 2010 (UTC)Huh01[reply]

FT Article

Sidley is mentioned repeatedly throughout this article: https://www.ft.com/content/1e8293f4-a1db-11e9-974c-ad1c6ab5efd1 - Mainly 18:52, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]