Talk:Shuja'iyya ambush

Warning: active arbitration remedies

The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:

You must be logged-in and extended-confirmed to edit or discuss this topic on any page (except for making edit requests, provided they are not disruptive)
You may not make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on any edits related to this topic
All participants in formal discussions (RfCs, RMs, etc) within the area of conflict are urged to keep their comments concise, and are limited to 1,000 words per discussion. Citations and quotations (whether from sources, Wikipedia articles, Wikipedia discussions, or elsewhere) do not count toward the word limit.

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

Further information

The exceptions to the extended confirmed restriction are:

Non-extended-confirmed editors may use the "Talk:" namespace only to make edit requests related to articles within the topic area, provided they are not disruptive.
Non-extended-confirmed editors may not create new articles, but administrators may exercise discretion when deciding how to enforce this remedy on article creations. Deletion of new articles created by non-extended-confirmed editors is permitted but not required.

With respect to the WP:1RR restriction:

Clear vandalism of whatever origin may be reverted without restriction. Also, reverts made solely to enforce the extended confirmed restriction are not considered edit warring.
Editors who violate this restriction may be blocked by any uninvolved administrator, even on a first offence.

After being warned, contentious topics procedure can be used against any editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process. Contentious topic sanctions can include blocks, topic-bans, or other restrictions.
Editors may report violations of these restrictions to the Arbitration enforcement noticeboard.

If you are unsure if your edit is appropriate, discuss it here on this talk page first. When in doubt, don't revert!

Military history: Middle East / Post-Cold War

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Middle Eastern military history task force
	Post-Cold War task force

Contested deletion

This page should not be speedily deleted because... The event did happen, and there should be an article about it. If it's a matter of formality for the article creator, I can recreate it… Eladkarmel (talk) 05:44, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

My suggestion is to create a page for the "Battle of Shuja'iyya" and add the Shuja'iyya ambush there. רונלד15 (talk) 22:16, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concur; will need to be disambiguated from the 2014 one. PrimaPrime (talk) 01:55, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What's a problem? There is an article Battle of Shuja'iyya, it should be renamed to "Battle of Shuja'iyya(2014)" and it should be added an article "Battle of Shuja'iyya(2023)". This is the way they are distinguished in Hebrew Wikipedia 2607:F2C0:E584:736:4C12:DD02:ED83:8E14 (talk) 00:56, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I concure. There is no point to document a single incident in such a large conflict in it's own page. צחי (talk) 09:11, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The death toll

It seems that the correct death toll is nine (per Israel that is). The other death occured on the same day was due to a separate incident. Gorgedweller (talk) 21:49, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Gorgedweller also, the 0 deaths for Hamas are not supported by the source quoted. 93.173.129.130 (talk) 15:09, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]