Talk:Shojo Beat/GA1
GA Review
[edit]Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
I read through this article and made some small fixes. Overall, it's very well-written and comprehensive. I had a few questions as I read through it, but they were answered almost immediately. I believe that the article meets the majority of the criteria for a Good Article, but I am placing it on hold because of a couple of concerns:
- References 2 and 21 need publishers (which I imagine are both Shojo Beat).
- I do not believe the image fits the criteria for a "low-resolution" image. According to Template:Non-free image data, low-resolution refers to images of 0.1 megapixels or less. If it is absolutely necessary to include an image this large, the rationale needs to explain why. I believe that, in this case, the image size should be reduced and a new version should be uploaded. The fair use rationale also needs to be improved, and I would like to see the template from Template:Non-free image data used.
I will place this nomination on hold to allow for these concerns to be addressed. Any questions or comments can be left here, as I have added this page to my watchlist. Best wishes, GaryColemanFan (talk) 20:11, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks. I've fixed those two refs (note that #2 moved to #20 after I moved it out of the infobox). I've also fixed the image. I didn't even think to check it when I started the article, and I agree that it was at way too high a res. Also fixed the FUR. -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 20:21, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
- Everything looks good now. Thanks for the quick reply. I will promote the article. GaryColemanFan (talk) 20:23, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
- Awesome and thanks for the fast review! -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 20:31, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
- Everything looks good now. Thanks for the quick reply. I will promote the article. GaryColemanFan (talk) 20:23, 6 October 2008 (UTC)