Talk:Shin Megami Tensei: Nine/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Judgesurreal777 (talk · contribs) 02:18, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
I will take this article! I will be by with my review soon. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 02:18, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
Rate | Attribute | Review Comment |
---|---|---|
1. Well-written: | ||
![]() |
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. | "Navigation round environments" in the gameplay section should probably be something like "Through"
|
![]() |
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. | formatting looks good, I would expand out the lead into three paragraphs or just reformat it.
|
2. Verifiable with no original research: | ||
![]() |
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. | Some of the references don't list their author or their websites publisher.
|
![]() |
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). | Four references came back with errors when I did the check links search, but they are all archived, as are all of your references. I think this is due to a check links error, and nothing to do with anything you have done, so your references all seem to be functional and archived.
|
![]() |
2c. it contains no original research. | most every sentence has an in-line citation, and no sentences that are controversial lack one. |
![]() |
2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism. | I ran the copyright violation checker and found no matches of any kind. |
3. Broad in its coverage: | ||
![]() |
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic. | The talk page of the article contains a list of references that could be useful in building the article. Please look at that list and make sure none of them have been left out that may prove useful
|
![]() |
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). | The article is very concise; there's no problem in this area. |
![]() |
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. | there are no signs of editorialization, and both the good and bad sides of the game seem to be well represented. |
![]() |
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. | Other than the nominators own edits, the article is very stable and of a high-quality with no disputes active. |
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio: | ||
![]() |
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content. | The games cover as a weak fair use rationale, seems totally generic. The fair use rationale itself states that it can be expanded to become more detailed, so please specify its use. Let me know if you have any questions about this.
|
![]() |
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. | The games cover being listed as "cover art" is not a great caption; better to have either a better explanation, like that it's the "original Japanese XBox release cover", or no caption it all.
|
![]() |
7. Overall assessment. | I will put the article on hold for seven days; if you begin work on it and find you need more time, let me know. I'm also available in case you have any questions or any issues arise. |
@Judgesurreal777: I think I have addressed everything now.--IDVtalk 10:19, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
- @IDV: Fantastic and speedy work. Passed! Judgesurreal777 (talk) 18:12, 30 May 2016 (UTC)