Jump to content

Talk:Shin Megami Tensei: Digital Devil Saga 2

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Inaccurate?

[edit]

The information on this article is mostly inaccurate and filled with spoilers. I recommend a clean up.

I agree. Too much and innecesary spoilers. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.123.122.239 (talk) 00:35, 26 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

"Real" and "AI" Characters

[edit]

For starters, I recommend distinguishing between the "real" charcters (the humans involved in the EGG experiments for up to five years before the events of DDS; not entirely playable but some are present as allies or enemies) and the "AI" characters (as Sera perceives the "real" characters; originating from the Junkyard plus Roland; very much playable unless they die). The "real" and "AI" charcaters can be polar opposites of each other, such as in the cases of Serph and Heat.

User:Riovanes 10:50, 27 Aug 2006

Massive Spoiler

[edit]

You have been warned.

Interesting comment: apparently, David/Gale was killed in the "real" world not due to the events of five years ago (when god/Brahman became angry and corrupted the sun's rays), but because of a terrorist attack on Jenna Angel's project. Also, it seems that Sera "places in the Junkyard" only the people important to her. If Sera did not "place" David/Gale in the Junkyard, then who did? Jenna Angel?

David/Gale and Jenna Angel's story may need to be included here, if it aims to be as comprehensive as the analogous article on the first DDS.

User:Riovanes 10:56, 27 Aug 2006

More spoilers perhaps...

[edit]

I'd have to agree with Riovanes. Whoever is in charge of this article needs to add a little bit more info about David/Gale. Why was HE in the Junkyard? Who put him there? Did Sera ever see David before he died? If so, did she put him in the Junkyard? But then... If she did... How come Gale doesn't quite look like David? Maybe because she only saw him a few times...? Anyway...

It'd be nice to have these questions answered. Oh, and if you can add any more info on Shroedinger and how it's related to Brahman and Seraph, please do.

Please and thank you~!

LokaPEDIA?

[edit]

Sorry I have only played the JP version. Is that the term Lokapedia actually appears in the game? Or is it sinply a joke? -- Sameboat - 同舟 07:41, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you specifically had the resistance group's name in mind, then no. Their name in the english version is "Lokapala" (which supposedly means "guardians of the gods").--Maikito 13:40, 23 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

So I just edited Seraph's article...

[edit]

...And it was changed back to the poorly-written way it was before. I'm not going to get into a edit war, but why is this page calling for an edit when some people won't accept them? 214.13.209.200 12:54, 6 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Character list

[edit]

Since the character list is so long, I put a tag suggesting it be split into List of characters from Shin Megami Tensei. I am not sure if this is the right place to send it, as I am not very familiar with the game, myself. If there is someone who knows about the game, please give your input. Mynameisnotpj (talk) 12:41, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have splitted the characters section. However, I did not fully moved the texts and left some on the main article (removing most of the details and leaving the introduction texts). Please do the appropriate changes if you want to remove everything in the main article, rendering users to turn over to the new, character list article.Logicartery (talk) 04:27, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
It would be rather difficult for anyone who don't actually know where the texts in the character list came from to move the section. Simply, it does not cite any references and would seem to appear to be original researches.122.53.163.187 (talk) 10:25, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I have declined the speedy deletion of this spin-out, as this situation does not meet speedy deletion criteria. However, I have noted the source of the new article in edit summary for GFDL compliance. I note that the guidelines for splitting articles did not set out steps for doing this; I have remedied that. Please determine here whether the editors interested in this subject feel this split is appropriate. If so, you will need to complete the steps by removing redundant information from this article and leaving a summary, with a pointer to the main article. If it is determined that the split is not appropriate, please consider handling the subpage by WP:PROD or, if the contributor who created it agrees to the deletion, he may tag it {{db-g7}} to indicate his request that an administrator remove the article. I'm watching this article; if you have any questions about my rationale, I will be happy to expand here. Thanks. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 12:44, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Miss Moonriddengirl, I already talked to 'some' of the contributors to the section but none of them replies. What could happen to the article now? And I'm very sorry because I lost track of those who really contributed to the article. 122.53.173.199 (talk) 10:32, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Improving the gameplay section

[edit]

I'm thinking the gameplay section needs some work or let's just simply leave it that way? I'll try to divide it into some sub-sections if ever.--JCD (Talk) 11:12, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Who asked for deletion of the article about the characters???

[edit]

I wasn't noticed or even asked for permission. That is so rude. I wasn't noticed at all. Whoever removed links from that article, better send me a message now asap.--JCD (Talk) 09:51, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]