Talk:ShieldsUP

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the ShieldsUP article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Computer Security: Computing Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computer Security, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computer security on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Computer SecurityWikipedia:WikiProject Computer SecurityTemplate:WikiProject Computer SecurityComputer Security articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by WikiProject Computing (assessed as Low-importance).

Things you can help WikiProject Computer Security with:

Article alerts will be generated shortly by AAlertBot. Please allow some days for processing. More information...

Review importance and quality of existing articles
Identify categories related to Computer Security
Tag related articles
Identify articles for creation (see also: Article requests)
Identify articles for improvement
Create the Project Navigation Box including lists of adopted articles, requested articles, reviewed articles, etc.
Find editors who have shown interest in this subject and ask them to take a look here.

Internet

	Internet portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Internet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InternetWikipedia:WikiProject InternetTemplate:WikiProject InternetInternet articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Notability question

The notability of this page has been questioned, but I have removed the tag because:

There are at least 5 reliable, credible, relevant third-party references (lifehacker, routersecurity.org, howtogeek, computerworld and makeuseof).
I think those together paint a picture of its general use, usefulness and notability in the industry.
I would note that it doesn't have a high profile outside of the network testing community, but then I wouldn't expect it to.

peterl (talk) 21:02, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

While I find it a useful and commendable site, I still have some doubts about its notability, through while borderline, I'd lean towards saying it is notable. Wish the coverage was discuss its significance, and not just be a "how to use", however. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 04:59, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Point taken. One factor is that the intended audience are more interested in what it does, rather than its significance. In my view phrases noted like "an oldie but goodie" (routersecurity) and "Everyone should run this test." (computerworld) make it notable. I've found a few other notations that I'll add too. peterl (talk) 21:07, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]