Jump to content

Talk:Shi'ar

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Shi'ar/Aerie

[edit]

I think Shi'ar is the name of the empire, and Aerie the name of the main conquering race with the avian features. Like, Deathbird and L'ilandra are both Aerie and Shi'ar (living in the Shi'ar empire) while others, such as Gladiator, Fang, and N'Rill'Irẽẽ, aren't Aerie, but they're still Shi'ar. They're just different races who live in the empire. Kinda how, like in Roman times, you could be Batavian and at the same time a Roman citizen, however, you weren't Latin. 62.194.121.100 12:06, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No, I disagree. It has been stated in several issues that the SHI'AR are the birdlike species. It is written somewhere in a caption that 'the Shi'ar vied with Hepzibah's feline race for domination of the same star system.' And only recently, Lorna wondered 'What disguises would do for us? We're obviously not Shi'ar,' indicating specific outward characteristics for the Shi'ar as a species. As for the name 'Aerie', Deathbird once stated that she 'belongs to the Aerie, the royal nest of the Shi'ar'. If there should be confusion anywhere concerning this article, it's whether or not the name Aerie can be used for the species, not Shi'ar. 194.171.56.13 12:28, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You got it all wrong. The Aerie is definitely the bird-like species with the hollow bones and the feathers. How often has it been that Shi'ar officers shouted 'For the Aerie!' They do that out of regard for the species, which is called AERIE. It's like shouting 'For the good of mankind!' Also, Shi'ar sounds more like a name, derived from a place or an ancestor. Shi'ar is the people, but, especially in inter-galactic communities, a people is not limited to a species. 62.194.121.100 12:49, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Lilandra.jpg

[edit]

Image:Lilandra.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 05:08, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Comics B-Class Assesment required

[edit]

This article needs the B-Class checklist filled in to remain a B-Class article for the Comics WikiProject. If the checklist is not filled in by 7th August this article will be re-assessed as C-Class. The checklist should be filled out referencing the guidance given at Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Assessment/B-Class criteria. For further details please contact the Comics WikiProject. Comics-awb (talk) 17:27, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

C-Class rated for Comics Project

[edit]

As this B-Class article has yet to receive a review, it has been rated as C-Class. If you disagree and would like to request an assesment, please visit Wikipedia:WikiProject_Comics/Assessment#Requesting_an_assessment and list the article. Hiding T 14:28, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Shi'ar. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:02, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unexplained revert

[edit]

Editor2020 recently made this unexplained revert of three minor changes I made to the article. Reverting edits without explanation is typically done only in cases where the edits are vandalism. None of my edits were vandalism. One was a minor style change (from "movie" to "film"), the other two were factual corrections. This edit corrected the release date of the film Dark Phoenix from 2018 to 2019, and this edit corrected its title, from X-Men: Dark Phoenix to Dark Phoenix. Anyone who looks at the article about the film will see that these changes were correct. FreeKnowledgeCreator (talk) 22:54, 18 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

That was an unintended revert. My apologies. Editor2020 (talk) 02:53, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]