Jump to content

Talk:Sheridan v News Group Newspapers Ltd

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Major pruning

[edit]

This article needs major pruning. This article is about a court case, yet much of the content is associated rumour, speculation, and innuendo that doesn't belong here. Alan Pascoe 17:03, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I think everything is sourced, but it still represents absurd weight--the individual legal steps day by day as reported by newspapers shouldn't concern us. In any event, this is ongoing news & will be easier to summarize once they finish, which looks like it will take another 8 to 12 months. DGG 03:06, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

appeal etc?

[edit]

So what happened? Did the News of the World definitively drop the appeal? This should be noted. As for allegations only made in one obviously biased newspaper, this is not serious.Johncmullen1960 (talk) 04:50, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No, as the article stated, the News of the World's appeal is suspended while the criminal case is dealt with. As for the allegations of intimidation, bribery etc., I take the point that nothing definite has happended about these allegations some time after they were made, but as a lot of legal wheels are still turning they cannot be ruled out, and they did appear in more than one paper. PatGallacher (talk) 10:03, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This one will run and run. The article may well be expanded substantially as the criminal trial starts. Do we want a separate article, HM Advocate v. Sheridan and Sheridan? Do we want to split this, and if so how? PatGallacher (talk) 21:17, 22 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There is a report on the grapevine that the start of the trial is now October 4th. Anyone know anything definite? PatGallacher (talk) 10:52, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Split article?

[edit]

Now that the criminal trial has started do we want to give it its own article? Or should we keep it together? PatGallacher (talk) 17:45, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest we seperate them, this is a trial in its own right¬¬ —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.156.62.95 (talk) 18:35, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Sheridan v News Group Newspapers Ltd. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:05, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Sheridan v News Group Newspapers Ltd. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:16, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Talk:Sheridan_v_News_Group_Newspapers_Ltd&oldid=1209340388"