Jump to content

Talk:Shepseskaf

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Featured articleShepseskaf is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on November 29, 2022.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
July 7, 2022Featured article candidatePromoted

Untitled

[edit]

this pic is for menkaura not shepseskaf .... and it is also exist in menkaura page ....plz remove it ... even though the magazine put it under the name of shepseskaf but logically it belongs to menkaura -- Ahmodye (talk) 16:50, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure, I read that it might just as well be Shepseskaf. Iry-Hor (talk) 16:43, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

2+1 or 3+3+1 pyramids?

[edit]

I have the impression that somebody forgot that the Pyramids of the dynasty were 3 for Sneferu alone, and 1 for each of his successors before Shepseskaf broke with the tradition of building pyramids.

There is a reference that Shepseskafs' ancestors only built 2+1 pyramids. This is certainly incorrect. Sikader (talk) 09:06, 27 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Where exactly? Please give the number of the references, I gonna check this ASAP. Regards;--Nephiliskos (talk) 09:15, 27 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Shepseskaf. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:06, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note on Shepseskaf mastaba architecture / shape

[edit]

I just got the brainwave that the reconstruction of Shepseskaf's unique mastaba architecture very much resembles the shape of the sarcophagus hieroglyph in the ancient name for the mastaba 'The purified pyramid', and there might actually be a real logic behind that name: a much simpler, back to basic (coffin) shape compared to the pyramid's of the direct predecessors. Yet, perhaps also given by the notion that Shepseskaf may not have been from royal origin, and with this funerary project expresses a more humble approach comparing himself to his royal predecessors.

Form and spelling of his name in Ancient Egyptian?

[edit]

We see only the conventional Egyptological pronunciation here. I would have expected at least the proper Egyptian transliteration and probably a rendering of the original hieroglyphs, if not the (reconstructed) true transcription - especially in a featured article. 87.126.21.225 (talk) 18:24, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The hieroglyphic names are listed in the infobox at the upper right corner of the page. There's a heading within the box that says "Royal titulary", with a button next to it that says "show". Click it and you'll see three of Shepseskaf's names listed. It's kind of incomplete, but one of my sources may have a fuller titulary; I'll have to check it when I have time later today. A. Parrot (talk) 19:25, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
OK, thanks for the info, but I still think that the original form should be written beside the name in the lede, just as it's done in other wiki articles, not just hidden in the infobox (besides, names aren't just titulary, so it's not where you expect to find them). I mean the nomen, which the form 'Shepseskaf' renders.--87.126.21.225 (talk) 09:45, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I now see the standard Wikipedian convention isn't followed in other Egyptological articles such 'Horus' and 'Isis' either, and besides that sometimes only hieroglyphics are used without transliteration. I see no reason for that.--87.126.21.225 (talk) 09:49, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]