Talk:Shearson

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany

??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Finance & Investment Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Finance & Investment, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Finance and Investment on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Finance & InvestmentWikipedia:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentTemplate:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentFinance & Investment
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Title of the article

Although there is an article about Lehman Brothers and an article about American Express, this article is intended to explore the history of the Shearson side of the firm - tracing its predecessors and the period during which Shearson was merged with American Express, Lehman and EF Hutton. |► ϋrбanяeneωaℓ • TALK ◄| 11:22, 17 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: move seems to have already been done, nowt for me to do here. Fences&Windows 18:36, 7 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Shearson Lehman Hutton → Shearson

Intend to combine Shearson Lehman Hutton with Shearson, Hammill & Co. to create a single article about Shearson from 1902 through the abandonment of the Shearson brand |► ϋrбanяeneωaℓ • TALK ◄| 16:53, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Or Shearson (disambiguation) to Shearson? Anthony Appleyard (talk) 09:50, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- I am not sure that makes any sense. They are all variations of the same company over its life. I am going to propose leaving Shearson Hammill & Co. as a separate article at its current location but there is no reason that the main focus of the article should not be on the entire history. This article as currently rewritten should be moved to Shearson. I don't think there needs to be a disambiguation page any more |► ϋrбanяeneωaℓ • TALK ◄| 11:40, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.