Talk:Shame (Robbie Williams and Gary Barlow song)/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Carbrera (talk · contribs) 02:16, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
Hello, I am Carbrera, and I'll be reviewing this article for possible good article submission.
Full review coming very soon. Carbrera (talk) 02:16, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
Infobox
[edit]- The single cover image needs an alt
- Redo the "recorded" section so it makes more sense; use Asking 4 It as an example please
- With all due respect, that's a choice. I prefer how it is in "Shame".
- Oh, I see. I was looking at this part exclusively through editing mode, so I overall assumed it would be a bulleted list. Yeah, this way's fine
- With all due respect, that's a choice. I prefer how it is in "Shame".
- Remove the "certification" section since its empty
Lead
[edit]Paragraph 1
[edit]- Remove the link to "lead single" per WP:OVERLINKING
Paragraph 2
[edit]- Remove the hidden linking of "|single charts"; it's unnecessary
- I think it's quite necessary because it links the UK Singles Chart
Development and release
[edit]Paragraph 1
[edit]- The description for the image is a bit confusing to me; could you reword it?
- "that he is..." → "that he was..."
- Remove "; Williams didn't join them at the beginning."
Paragraph 2
[edit]- "William's" → "Williams'"
- The article is written in British English and Britons use ex. Williams's over Williams', but it's fixed now :)
- The second sentence uses a a lot of commas; could you reword this sentence as well?
- I tried my best here.
Paragraph 3
[edit]- Insert a comma after "some countries"
- "apart of the title track,..." → "apart from the title track,..."
Composition and lyrical interpretation
[edit]- I would change the section title to "Composition and lyrics"
- According to me it should be either 'Composition and lyrical interpretation' or 'Music and lyrics'; I usually prefer the first one
- The rest of this section is fantastic
- Thank you!
Critical reception
[edit]Paragraph 1
[edit]- You could add a link to contemporary music critics here
- Are there more reviews you could add to this section; it would benefit the article greatly?
- Unfortunately I couldn't find more :/
Chart performance
[edit]Paragraph 1
[edit]- Add a topic sentence discussing the track's commercial performance/reception please
- I think we should leave the people to judge it, because everybody has diff perception of it honestly
- Other than that, also good work
Music video
[edit]Paragraph 1
[edit]- Can you add dates on when the video was shot? If applicable of course...
- Done.
- Instead of the photo of the two actors, would one of the actual video be more beneficial?
- I did have, but there isn't a clear scene that we can use honestly, so the photo got removed and I added pics of the actors
- The synopsis is good, but a bit long? Do you think it should be shortened a bit?
- Tried to cut it a bit, I think it's fine now, no?
Live performances
[edit]- You use "Shame" a lot; remember, you can also use "the track", "the single", "the song", etc....
- Done. Used only twice now.
End of GA Review:
[edit]A very strong article. Please look at my suggestions, consider them, and message me when you'd like me to take another look at it. Thanks. Carbrera (talk) 23:25, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
- Carbrera Thanks for your review. All the queries are done now, the ones which are not, you have a response regarding them. ;) — Tom(T2ME) 09:56, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
- Tomica I'll pass it now. Thanks for your work on this article! Carbrera (talk) 14:02, 2 April 2016 (UTC)