Talk:Shakedown: Return of the Sontarans

Doctor Who Low‑importance

	Doctor Who portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Doctor Who, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Doctor Who and its spin-offs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this notice, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Doctor WhoWikipedia:WikiProject Doctor WhoTemplate:WikiProject Doctor WhoDoctor Who articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Film: British

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the British cinema task force.

Novels: Sci-fi Mid‑importance

	Novels portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Science fiction task force.

Novelisation

I've not read the book, but I seem to remember that Dave Owen's review in Doctor Who Magazine at the time implied that rather than changing the events of the video to incorporate the Doctor and co, Dicks incorporated the events of the video script pretty much as seen on screen as a Doctor-less section in the middle seventy-odd pages of the book. Is this the case? Angmering 21:03, 25 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, pretty much. Drwhoguide.com has a summary of the novel version here. —Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 22:11, 25 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Good work

Good work on expanding my initial stub. I noticed that since Downtime had an article, there should be one on Shakedown as well. The only thing missing is a more detailed plot summary, but having not seen the film I couldn't do this myself, and I didn't want to potentially copyvio Drwhoguide.com which does have a detailed summary. 23skidoo 16:25, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Shakedown: Return of the Sontarans. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20061015182823/http://ourworld.compuserve.com:80/homepages/Mark_Ayres/Shakedwn.htm to http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/Mark_Ayres/Shakedwn.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 07:46, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]