Jump to content

Talk:Shabiha

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Shabeeha are not representing Bashar Al Asad

[edit]

In fact Shabeeha are a gang that work and trade with weapons and Drugs, However, the Syrian Goverment has killed alot of them especially in 2003 when the brother of Bashar Al Asad (Maher) went to Latakia (West of Syria)to destroy them, IT IS NOT TRUE WHAT IS BEEN WRITTEN IN THE ESSAY. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Maihab (talk • contribs) 03:12, 21 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This article is a mess

[edit]

I tried to clean the lead up a tad, without deleting anything (except the obvious and uncontroversial). I did delete a reference to 'zanga' as thugs, which it most definitely is not. Zanga was just mentioned in the blog post as an example of a word uttered in the Arab Spring that gained widespread use in protests. Shabiha and baltajia (baltagia in Egyptian accent, balatija in Yemen) are pretty much synonymous. Their use most definitely predates the current wave of protests and revolutions in the Arab World, and simply means thugs. However the greatest exposure to the word is definitely due to the Syrian uprising. What I take issue with is that the lead of the article defines the term by one man's unsubstantiated view of a group of people. Shabiha are not necessarily Alawites, and they are not necessarily a paramilitary. Alas, this article needs much more work than I have time to put in to it. Here is an article in Arabic on the history of the word and its use in the Syrian protests --Fjmustak (talk) 02:48, 11 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed, the article is total crap, sounds like propaganda from saudi arabia. There are no sources to base ANY of the claims given. It reads as if the FSA is trying to find excuses as to why they shoot at civilians, because they suspect them to be "Shabiha". 84.112.136.52 (talk) 21:13, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Text on Houla massacre

[edit]

The section on the Houla massacre has been created primarily with text from that article; please see Houla massacre's page history for attribution. Khazar2 (talk) 20:23, 30 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Overhaul

[edit]

With the attention the Shabiha are getting this week due to the Houla massacre, I've made an attempt to overhaul the article by verifying citations and removing unsourced or unsupported claims. I'd be glad to have my own double-check double-checked, however. The grand diff is here: [1]. If I've pulled out anything that should still be here, I hope people will re-add it, just with a clear citation this time. Khazar2 (talk) 21:19, 30 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

2012 Hama massacre

[edit]

Shabiha are also mentioned as being perpetrators for the 2012 Hama massacre here's a BBC article as a source . EdwardLane (talk) 11:07, 7 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Added a brief mention to the Houla section. As the news on this continues to unfold, perhaps a second section could be started on the (currently just alleged) Hama massacre, or given their apparent similarities, perhaps both could be discussed in one section? We'll see how the news shakes out when the UN gets there tomorrow. Khazar2 (talk) 11:13, 7 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Undue weight

[edit]

This article gives way too much undue weight to questionable and sensationalist opposition claims. I have changed the intro accordingly, but the article itself may need clean-up. FunkMonk (talk) 16:01, 8 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

perhaps westerlings ( a neologism , not in a dictionary but a marvellous addition to the worlds vocabulary)-have been involved in this. you are a bit vague however. Which claims are questionable and sensationalist. Sayerslle (talk) 16:15, 8 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
That it is a "sectarian militia", for example. There are many notable Sunnis. And Westerling is the natural counterpart to Easterling. FunkMonk (talk) 16:21, 8 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
perhaps 'pro-government militias' could be used instead while how uniform in make-up they are is researched. is that it? have the westerlings been active elsewhere, up to their knavish tricks, in the article? Sayerslle (talk) 16:35, 8 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
It is already used, and of course it should be mentioned that some sources describe them as sectarian militias, but we should not write it as if fact. As for the shenanigans of the fab four here, I guess you would know better than me, eh? FunkMonk (talk) 16:43, 8 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
caertainly 'some sources' do - as here from the guardian in May last year -"a reserve army of loosely employed, poor young men from the Alawite offshoot of Shia Islam that has proved very useful to a regime that has made paranoia about enemies, real and imagined, the cornerstone of its survival." - [2] - "paranoia about enemies, real and imagined" - good phrase that.Sayerslle (talk) 16:52, 8 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
in that article too it speaks about Sunni involvement, as paymasters even "As Syria retreated from Lebanon in 2005 and warmed to the west, it lumbered towards a dysfunctional kind of market economy. The result was to hand power to a new kind of businessman, usually Sunni, who managed to forge links with the Alawite-dominated clique that controls the tentacles of Syria's security state.

As profit moved away from smuggling and towards more legitimate business interests, a small core of well-connected operators grabbed control of industries, equipment, franchises and car dealerships – one of the central complaints of ordinary Syrians as the uprising has gathered momentum in the last year.

It's these same businessmen, many of them Sunni and not Alawite, who are now quietly passing money to the shabiha, mainly to protect their lucrative business privileges, but also to keep their political sponsors happy." Sayerslle (talk) 19:40, 9 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Translation

[edit]

"Shabeeha" does not mean "thugs" in Arabic. The closest translation would be "spectres" or "apparitions", so I will change it. - ☣Tourbillon A ? 07:26, 11 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

POV term

[edit]

The term "Shabiha" is an invention, and not a self denomination for any group. It is just a term the Syrian insurgents use as umbrella for all pro-government groups and individuals, and which they use to justify execution of such. This article takes their claims at face value, which it shouldn't. The term should not be used elsewhere, "pro-government militia" or some such should. FunkMonk (talk) 14:47, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps you are right; your statement sounds logical. But where have you got your knowledge from? Might be useful to know, if we want to improve the article. And please give examples of the 'claims' of insurgents which this article unjustifiedly takes at face value, as you claim: would also help us to improve the article. --Corriebertus (talk) 14:32, 26 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

According to the Syrian official authorities the "Shabiha" no exist

[edit]

SPIEGEL: So you deny that the Shabiha militia was involved?

Assad: What do you mean by "Shabiha?"

SPIEGEL: This militia, the "ghosts," who are close to your regime.

Assad: This is a Turkish name. There is nothing called "Shabiha" in Syria. http://www.spiegel.de/international/world/spiegel-interview-with-syrian-president-bashar-assad-a-926456.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by LogFTW (talk • contribs) 02:47, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

no such thing,,,,,

[edit]

There's no such thing as a shabiha no matter how hard you try to make it seem.... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2606:6000:60C1:1D00:A463:F193:C09:E7CC (talk) 14:15, 14 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 4 external links on Shabiha. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 02:05, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Shabiha. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 05:04, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Shabiha. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 05:02, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Shabiha. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 02:44, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Shabiha vs Struggle Companies

[edit]

Could it be that the Shabiha, presuming they actually exist, are actually the Struggle Companies who seem to have disappeared? Just curious as 5,000 seems to be the common strength quoted.Degen Earthfast (talk) 00:44, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Conspiracy theorists in the lede

[edit]

I just reverted a bunch of edits that added conspiracy theorists and other unreliable sources into the lede, along with a bunch of POV language. Please use reliable sources only and WP:NPOV. Jushyosaha604 (talk) 15:28, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not Alawite

[edit]

This article has been changed since few years ago by removing all the references and sources to the fact that many Shabiha were from Sunni families and Sunni tribes loyal to the government. Not all Shabiha were Alawites, and their platform wasn’t “anti Sunni”, as leading Sunni families, for example in Aleppo, led their local Shabiha groups. Shabiha platform was pro government, not some mythical Alawite-Sunni conflict. For example, this source mentions; “ In Aleppo Governorate, the term Shabihais used frequently to refer to pro-Assad Sunni tribes.” 193.119.115.107 (talk) 21:15, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Literal translation

[edit]

The literal meaning is stated as "ghosts" But doesn't the word Shabiga (شبيحة) cone from the verb/action of "شبح"? Which is tying someone's hands and keeping them up against a wall or something higher than their body - RamiPat (talk) 23:50, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Talk:Shabiha&oldid=1262356106"