Talk:Sha Tin
 | This article is written in Hong Kong English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, realise, travelled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
Fair use rationale for File:Sha Tin District Council Logo.svg
[edit]
File:Sha Tin District Council Logo.svg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a non-free use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
-- Marchjuly (talk) 01:42, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Sha Tin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added
{{dead link}}tag to http://www.thestandard.com.hk/news_detail.asp?pp_cat=49&art_id=154127&sid=43862683&con_type=1&d_str=20150210&isSearch=1&sear_year=2015 - Added archive https://archive.is/20150311123401/http://www.thestandard.com.hk/news_detail.asp?pp_cat=30&art_id=126697&sid=37708163&con_type=3&d_str=20120921&isSearch=1&sear_year=2012 to http://www.thestandard.com.hk/news_detail.asp?pp_cat=30&art_id=126697&sid=37708163&con_type=3&d_str=20120921&isSearch=1&sear_year=2012
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150402173649/http://www.thestandard.com.hk/news_detail.asp?pp_cat=30&art_id=154988&sid=44036440&con_type=3&d_str=20150309&isSearch=1&sear_year=2015 to http://www.thestandard.com.hk/news_detail.asp?pp_cat=30&art_id=154988&sid=44036440&con_type=3&d_str=20150309&isSearch=1&sear_year=2015
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:49, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
Parallel article - Sha Tin - Sha Tin New Town - Sha Tin District
[edit]- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
- To improve but not merge, given that these are important distinct topics; overlap is nevertheless recognized. Klbrain (talk) 16:20, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
The current article that occupy "Sha Tin" article title, has way too much content that actually for "Sha Tin New Town", which "Sha Tin New Town" or known as just "Sha Tin Town", has legally defined boundary. Sha Tin District has legally defined boundary too but "Sha Tin" itself is not.
It is a common problem of HK geo article, since literature often omit the suffix "town" or "district", so that the word "Sha Tin" can refer to "Sha Tin District", or its smaller non-administrative fork division "Sha Tin" (area that not belong to Tai Wai and Ma On Shan). Since it is waste of time and original research to define the boundaries of "Sha Tin", lets concentrate content on Sha Tin New Town and Sha Tin District. Matthew hk (talk) 09:27, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
- Keep separate articles. Rewrite them. 219.77.116.215 (talk) 12:25, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
- Ok, it seem the merge discussion was misplaced / yet another Parallel that also located at Talk:Sha Tin New Town#Merger proposal. Matthew hk (talk) 08:43, 5 January 2021 (UTC)