Talk:Sexually transmitted infection

A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on January 31, 2005 and January 31, 2006.

Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Sexually transmitted infection.

PubMed provides review articles from the past five years (limit to free review articles)
The TRIP database provides clinical publications about evidence-based medicine.
Other potential sources include: Centre for Reviews and Dissemination and CDC

Medicine: Translation / Reproductive Top‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Translation task force (assessed as High-importance).
	This article is supported by the Reproductive medicine task force (assessed as Top-importance).
	This article was selected on the Medicine portal as one of Wikipedia's best articles related to Medicine.

Sexology and sexuality High‑importance

	Human sexuality portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sexology and sexuality, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of human sexuality on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Sexology and sexualityWikipedia:WikiProject Sexology and sexualityTemplate:WikiProject Sexology and sexualitySexology and sexuality articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women's Health High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's Health, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's Health on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HealthWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HealthTemplate:WikiProject Women's Healthwomen's health articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale.

This article has previously been nominated to be moved. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination.

Move logs: Sexually transmitted disease
Sexually transmitted infection

Discussions:

RM, Sexually-transmitted infection → Sexually transmitted infection, Moved to Sexually transmitted disease, 16 March 2006
RM, Sexually transmitted disease → sexually transmitted infection, No consensus to move, 1 February 2011
RM, Sexually transmitted disease → Sexually transmitted infection, Not moved, 4 February 2012
RM, Sexually transmitted disease → Sexually transmitted infection, Moved, 11 January 2015

Archives

Index 1, 2, 3, 4, 5

This page has archives. Sections older than 180 days may be automatically archived by when more than 4 sections are present.

Venereal disease

I would like the old term VD - Venereal Disease to be preserved, a country which protects its "reputation" in an unsavoury fashion from its own citizens´legal international recourse is notable for promoting the spread of VD - Venereal Disease via encouraging its acceptance as a natural disease, when practice has proven it is not but is the direct result of prostitution, and secondarily of intercourse with grossly promiscuous individuals who may have had physical relation with an infected individual who has had intercourse with another infected individual so that the chain of individuals can lead on to prostitution. Moreover today the WHO and the police worldwide in effect promote the spread of VD through never sufficiently isolated and protected full physical examinations and body searches, which also applies to prisons. 77.54.42.69 (talk) 19:00, 12 February 2013‎ (UTC)[reply]

"Dirty pussy" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Dirty pussy. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. SpicyMilkBoy (talk) 08:55, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Definition

User:TylerDurden8823 To be defined as an STI requires that the disease be "commonly spread by sexual activity". With respect to adding:

For N. meningitis we have a few cases[1]. For Shigella this is not a common route. For Zika maybe. Will look for a source.

Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 09:13, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

We have the CDC here https://www.cdc.gov/zika/hc-providers/clinical-guidance/sexualtransmission.html still not sure if I would classify it as an STI though.

We do have this section Sexually_transmitted_infection#Viruses_in_semen were we state that these infections can be spread but are not STIs per say. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 09:22, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Some literature and sources are starting to suggest Shigella as an emerging STI on closer look. It may be slightly too soon for N. meningitidis though there was a cluster of ~300 cases (so not exactly what I would call super rare or "a few" necessarily), but as you say, I see the definition on our page emphasizes it being common. Although Zika is known to be spread through sexual contact, it's possible that it's not "officially" listed as one just yet. TylerDurden8823 (talk) 17:26, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

STI vs STD

Autisticeditor 20 has been on what I can only describe as a crusade against all mentions of the phrase "sexually transmitted disease", in favor of "sexually transmitted infection". I'm interested in seeing if such moves are necessary; I would think that both are essentially synonyms and it does not matter as long as there is consistency within each article. Anonymous 03:03, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Autisticeditor 20: and @George Ho: I'm pinging both of you due to your connection to this article and the discussion subject. Anonymous 02:00, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I've not been involved with the article for some years. Unsure what to say about STD vs. STI consistency matter. I just know that "infection" is part of the current title. George Ho (talk) 02:07, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I assumed you might have some input as you were responsible for the most recent RM (granted, quite some time ago). If not, it may be worth bringing to RfC. Anonymous 04:04, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]