This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sexology and sexuality, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of human sexuality on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Sexology and sexualityWikipedia:WikiProject Sexology and sexualityTemplate:WikiProject Sexology and sexualitySexology and sexuality
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 00:02, December 19, 2024 (JST, Reiwa 6) (Refresh)JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related
This article is part of WikiProject Gender studies. This WikiProject aims to improve the quality of articles dealing with gender studies and to remove systematic gender bias from Wikipedia. If you would like to participate in the project, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.Gender studiesWikipedia:WikiProject Gender studiesTemplate:WikiProject Gender studiesGender studies
This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBTQ+ studies
Transgenderism is described already in Heian period texts. For example Taketori monogatari. Someone with better English skills than me should fix that part. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.119.178.77 (talk) 13:40, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Hey,I'm fairly new to Wikipedia, so I'm not sure about this, but something doesn't feel right or academic about the 9th paragraph of section 2, "Modern Japanese LGBT life," especially how it uses the future-tense. It was written in 2007 about the current issues then, and what Japanese politicians have to do in the future, but it's written more like a light news article, and more importantly, it does not address what has been done since. This suggestion of "what must be done" is also not exactly Wikipedia-ish. Combine this with the lack of a citation, and I think this might be something like independent research and a personal view of the "situation," or even something more drastic. Not sure how to tackle, please, could a more experienced Wikipedian help out? 65.49.139.21 (talk) 19:25, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hi - thanks for pointing this out. You're right, that's definitely something that needs a firm going-over, and I'll give it a rewrite and shape it up myself. (In future - please don't be afraid to be bold and have a go yourself!) Thanks! -- Ineffablebookkeeper (talk) 10:48, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
.svg){kind=small}
