Jump to content

Talk:Sexual Harassment (The Office)/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Looking good. Only a few suggestions:

  • Unbold quotes around episode title.
Done --Mr.crabby ''''' (Talk) 14:43, 7 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • he realizes that he's not in trouble, that the lawyer's job is to protect him -- avoid contractions and use "he is"; also maybe there should be an "and" after the comma?
Done --Mr.crabby ''''' (Talk) 14:43, 7 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • asks in whispers (shushed by an embarrassed Pam) which one is Jim -- which what is Jim?
Done --Mr.crabby ''''' (Talk) 14:43, 7 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Michael stops Todd Packer when he tries to share another inappropriate joke -- reads kind of oddly to have Todd's surname when none of the other characters have a surname upon second mention.
    • In Production he's also referred to as just Packer. Whichever you think is best, just refer to his as "Todd" or "Packer" after his first mention.
Done --Mr.crabby ''''' (Talk) 14:43, 7 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Having both worked in office environments prior to filming The Office -- italicise the show title; and do we need to link office?
  • Corvette currently links to a type of warship -- perhaps you mean Chevrolet Corvette? :)
Done --Mr.crabby ''''' (Talk) 14:43, 7 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Done --Mr.crabby ''''' (Talk) 14:59, 7 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Again (I think I addressed this in a previous Office review), per WP:MOSTV#Reception polls to the general public are considered unreliable and shouldn't be included, i.e. the OfficeTally.com poll.
Removed --Mr.crabby ''''' (Talk) 14:59, 7 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Image:TheOffice(US)2-02.jpg isn't low resolution and should be scaled down; also, is there a better image we could use? The situation with Jim isn't mentioned in the plot so obviously wasn't a really pivotal part of the episode.
How about now? --Mr.crabby ''''' (Talk) 14:59, 7 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That's about it :) Good luck with the changes, the article's on hold for a week. —97198 talk 07:00, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Awesome. Only one little thing outstanding (he iss not in trouble) but that's easily fixed and I'm happy to promote to GA status in the meantime. —97198 talk 06:23, 8 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]