Talk:Sex swing

This article was previously nominated for deletion. The result of the discussion was keep..

	Human sexuality portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sexology and sexuality, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of human sexuality on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Sexology and sexualityWikipedia:WikiProject Sexology and sexualityTemplate:WikiProject Sexology and sexualitySexology and sexuality articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Wikify

Wikified as part of the Wikipedia:WikiProject Wikify! JubalHarshaw 16:18, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Reads like an ad

The Different Types section reads like an ad. I know nothing about the subject, but it would be nice if someone could replace the current section with an actual comparison of types rather than the current vague product descriptions. Failing that, the section should be deleted. BookishAcolyte (talk) 06:36, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sex swing is merchandising jargon

The technical term is a sit sling. I suggest that the present article on sex swings be supplanted by subsection on slings for sexual activity under Slings-furniture and re-entitled Slings for Sexual activity. What's in the back of my mind is that any device called a sex swing is likely to be a poorly made novelty item, rather than a functional piece of gear that can really make sex more pleasant (if you are so inclined). Jes' sayin'. Floozybackloves (talk) 03:25, 28 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

'Citations needed' overload

so one user complains that a section reads too much like an advertisement, and an editor adds the requested info and re-works the section. later, another editor comes along and fills nearly the entire article with 'Citation needed' requests. i believe its WP policy to use a template at the top of the article when she/he believes an article to be poorly referenced--Template:Unreferenced or Template:Refimprove

the overtagging here seems to border on spam or vandalism. especially since there was nothing put here on the Talk page (perhaps because the statements tagged were not contentious), and instead the editor just threw in all the tags on a subject that she/he may know little about, and so not know when something presented might be considered "common knowledge" or "obviously true." Colbey84 (talk) 14:39, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Sex swing. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20160204100354/http://www.passionshop.com/blog/sex-toys/how-to-use-a-sex-swing to http://www.passionshop.com/blog/sex-toys/how-to-use-a-sex-swing

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 11:51, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Sex swing. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20160204100354/http://www.passionshop.com/blog/sex-toys/how-to-use-a-sex-swing to http://www.passionshop.com/blog/sex-toys/how-to-use-a-sex-swing

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 10:04, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]