Talk:Severan dynasty

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by WikiProject Royalty and Nobility (assessed as High-importance).

Classical Greece and Rome High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

European history High‑importance

	Europe portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject European history, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the history of Europe on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.European historyWikipedia:WikiProject European historyTemplate:WikiProject European historyEuropean history
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

I've added brief synopses of the emperors of this dynasty, and named some of the powerful women who ruled through several of them. Sources are not given because I've basically used the existing Wikipedia articles for each emperor. Jperrylsu (talk) 01:01, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think the sentence "assassinations of their two sons" must change to "with assistant of their two sons" Ahmadrazi1332 (talk) 01:08, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Ahmadrazi1332: The sentence means that both sons were assassinated. (Geta killed by Caracalla's soldiers, Caracalla killed by one of his soldiers). GPinkerton (talk) 01:11, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

TKANK YOU Ahmadrazi1332 (talk) 06:27, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox

I think the infobox should be changed -- how could anyone resist the bookends of "Preceded by: Year of the Five Emperors" and "Followed by: Year of the Six Emperors"? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 104.153.40.58 (talk) 21:47, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Severan Dynasty Origins

@Remsense explain your recent undo edits on the Roman-Berber origins of the dynasty as clearly stated by the sources provided including a peer reviewed publication.

Lobus (talk) 14:41, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'd prefer we keep the discussion in one place, and I've already stated my basic position at Talk:Geta (emperor). Per what I've linked, the onus is primarily on you to indicate that the inclusion is both mainstream and due for inclusion. An example mainstream source that merely describes the Severans as Punic is Birley, Anthony R. (2016). "Septimius Severus, Lucius, Roman emperor, 193–211 CE". Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Classics. Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acrefore/9780199381135.013.5836. ISBN 978-0-19-938113-5.

Also, I do not want to cast aspersions, but I genuinely hope that was not your IP in the most recent round of reverts. If so, that would be completely unacceptable. Remsense ‥ 论 15:08, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have not made any reverts using IP address, I do not mind if you would like to verify the case.

Since you allowed yourself to undo edits in 3 articles successively without engaging in talks in each one then you have to engage in 3 talks in 3 articles as per standard, address in each article why was it the case that you moved from article to article and undid all edits done by me which is considered a Wikipedia:NPOV and a form of Wikipedia:Vandalism.

If you believe my edits are contested then share your own verifiable sources on the matter. including Peer reviewed sources. If you do not contest the statements+sources I personally edited in these articles then a valid explanation for the removal of sourced content is needed as it goes against wikipedia rules. Lobus (talk) 15:16, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, it is rare that an IP makes their first ever edits to insert themselves into a situation to undo "edit warring" between two unknown parties—especially with edits that were clearly not edit warring, nor vandalism, nor "a WP:NPOV" (?). You are very clearly required to establish consensus for your additions, so I recommend you accept that and stop behaving uncivilly. Remsense ‥ 论 15:23, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Given you are not the IP, would you mind restoring the articles to how they were previously, since per WP:ONUS you are still required to establish consensus for the additions before they can be published? Remsense ‥ 论 15:29, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I do not like you accusative tone, like I said before, if you would like to verify IP address editing there is a procedure for such. Lobus (talk) 15:47, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]