Talk:Seven Natural Wonders of the UK

A fact from Seven Natural Wonders of the UK appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 2 August 2022 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that a survey found that only 10 per cent of Britons had heard of all Seven Natural Wonders of the UK (one pictured)?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2022/August. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Seven Natural Wonders of the UK.

United Kingdom Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article was created or improved during the "The 20,000 Challenge: UK and Ireland", which started on 20 August 2016 and is still open. You can help!

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 09:31, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

Wastwater

... that a survey found that only 10% of Britons had heard of all Seven Natural Wonders of the UK (Wastwater pictured)? Source: "Surprisingly, only one in ten Britons had heard of all seven locations" from: "Seven Natural Wonders Of The UK". Sidetracked. Retrieved 20 July 2022.
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Carl-Gustav Groth

Moved to mainspace by Dumelow (talk). Self-nominated at 07:40, 21 July 2022 (UTC).[reply]

General eligibility:

New enough:
Long enough:
Other problems:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
Freely licensed: Used in article: Clear at 100px:

QPQ: Done.

Overall: Nice pix. Must have been hard selecting one. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 08:51, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

is this just public relations?

I feel uncomfortable about this. It has been selected by the RGS, in conjunction with advertiser, but I honestly doubt it means very much. It's just to get column inches for the advertiser. It feels like we are being played. Secretlondon (talk) 21:49, 2 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The RGS say "7 natural wonders" not "the 7 natural wonders" and they say paid partnership (ie ad). Facebook page of RGS. From this the selection was done by the advertiser not by the RGS. Outside of this campaign the "seven natural wonders" isn't a thing. Secretlondon (talk) 21:59, 2 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Secretlondon, I was aware that it was a partnership with Merrell and that it likely doesn't mean much but still seems to have received fairly broad coverage and deserving of an article (in a way most of the "7 wonders of xxx" are promotional in nature). The reporting I read indicated that he RGS selected the wonders eg. "Put together by the Royal Geographical Society (with IBG), the list identifies areas with shared beauty, uniqueness, and geological significance." and "Dovedale has attracted the accolade from the Royal Geographical Society which partnered with outdoor brand Merrell to select the best places." - Dumelow (talk) 06:47, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]