Talk:Sesame/GA1
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Nominator: Chiswick Chap (talk · contribs) 19:53, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
Reviewer: Luiysia (talk · contribs) 16:58, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you very much! Chiswick Chap (talk) 17:32, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
- Well-written:
The style and tone of this article is good. I found some parts which could use clarification:
Under "Origins and History":
- "It has been claimed that trading of sesame"... It would be good to give a more specific basis or origin for this claim.
- Attributed.
- "earning it the name of survivor crop" should clarify if this is some kind of official term or name for the crop, or a descriptor - seems based on the source that it's a descriptor but it's unclear here.
- Attributed.
Under "Botany":
- "The mass of 100 seeds is 0.203 g." Since previously in the paragraph it's stated that the size of the seeds varies, we should say if this is a specific cultivar or type of seed.
- Good point, added.
Otherwise no issues.
Verifiable with no original research: Citations look good, and did not see any copyright violation.
- Noted.
Broad in its coverage: This went into a good amount of depth, although under the section "Culinary use" could have covered the use of sesame as a flavoring or filling in Asia more, as well as uses in North America.
- ...
Neutral: Did not find any issue with neutrality.
- Noted.
Stable: Review of recent history did not find any edit warring.
- Noted.
Illustrated: Good use of images and tables for information. Did not find any usage issues.
- Noted.
Overall, good article, close to passing this, just could use a few clarifications. Thanks for reviewing my article!
- Many thanks for the review. Chiswick Chap (talk) 17:45, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks for addressing the issues. Pass! Luiysia (talk) 19:27, 30 January 2025 (UTC)