Jump to content

Talk:Serious Sam: The Second Encounter/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: XTheBedrockX (talk · contribs) 19:03, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This article looks promising. Planning to give this a review.

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section): b (inline citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

Conclusion

[edit]

After a review of this article, I believe it meets all the criteria required for a GA-level article. Congratulations on making a quality page! — Preceding unsigned comment added by XTheBedrockX (talkcontribs) 08:56, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the review, @XTheBedrockX! I see you made a few edits to the article. They were largely pretty solid, though a few mistakes also seem to have slipped in (particularly regarding apostrophes). I fixed these just now and am happy that we brought the article into a decent state. Kind regards, IceWelder [] 11:56, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
You’re very welcome! XTheBedrockX (talk) 12:22, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]