Talk:Sergeant Major of the Army

Military history: Culture / North America / United States

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion not met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military culture, traditions, and heraldry task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force

Pay grade

E-9 or O-9? When the billet is equal to a Lt.General it would be O-9. --95.222.191.0 (talk) 08:48, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sergeant Major of the Army is an noncommissioned rank and position of office with the paygrade of E-9. Only one enlisted man holds this rank and position. The importance of this singular position within the enlisted ranks of the Army, is equivalent to that of the importance of a lieutenant general may hold. Neovu79 (talk) 23:20, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

SMA insignia

The SMA insignia for 1994 - 2015 looks identical to the one following it -- 2015 to present. Is there a difference I'm missing??

GeeBee60 (talk) 06:59, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@GeeBee60: With the uniform change from the old green Class "A" uniform to the blue ASU for everyday wear, the green backing became obsolete in 2015. EricSerge (talk) 15:53, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Sergeant Major of the Army. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:45, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Protocol

What protocol places the SMA higher than all LTGs? Yes, he works for the CSA but a 2LT outranks him....period. Could a 2LT tell the SMA what to do, of course not. Not because of protocol, but because a 2LT would never be put in a position to do so. My source.....23 years in the Army! 161.97.200.229 (talk) 16:49, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Timeline

The timeline is incorrect for Tilley and Preston. SuzMK (talk) 23:42, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]