Talk:Serendipity (software)
![]() | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
Thanks for nominating this stub for deletion within 30 seconds of its creation.
Not fiction, it's software.
Not an advert: I've never even used it, but a friend started doing so, so I did some research.
It's not listed on the CMS section (will go cat it now if you gimme a minute), but it seems to have a decent user base.
T L Miles 18:15, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
Took off the unref / notablity tag
[edit]The article has always had refs (someone changed References to External Links, so I changed it back). Notability? one of the refs is a review from a trade publication. Specific concerns should go to the talk page. Since nothing appeared here after the tag was added a month ago, I'm removing.T L Miles 15:52, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Serendipity-book.png
[edit]![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/f/f7/Nuvola_apps_important.svg/70px-Nuvola_apps_important.svg.png)
Image:Serendipity-book.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 21:31, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
Broken Link
[edit]The last reference (Serendipity Tips: Agregated (sic) blogging with Serendipity) is broken. It now points to shopping links page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.113.37.7 (talk) 11:11, 6 August 2010 (UTC)