This article is within the scope of WikiProject Serbia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Serbia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SerbiaWikipedia:WikiProject SerbiaTemplate:WikiProject SerbiaSerbia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Former countries, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of defunct states and territories (and their subdivisions). If you would like to participate, please join the project.Former countriesWikipedia:WikiProject Former countriesTemplate:WikiProject Former countriesformer country articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages articles
Serbian Empire is part of the WikiProject Albania, an attempt to co-ordinate articles relating to Albania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. If you are new to editing Wikipedia visit the welcome page so as to become familiar with the guidelines. If you would like to participate, please join the project and help with our open tasks.AlbaniaWikipedia:WikiProject AlbaniaTemplate:WikiProject AlbaniaAlbania articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Greece, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Greek history on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GreeceWikipedia:WikiProject GreeceTemplate:WikiProject GreeceGreek articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject North Macedonia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of North Macedonia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.North MacedoniaWikipedia:WikiProject North MacedoniaTemplate:WikiProject North MacedoniaNorth Macedonia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject European history, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the history of Europe on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.European historyWikipedia:WikiProject European historyTemplate:WikiProject European historyEuropean history articles
The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to the Balkans or Eastern Europe, which has been designated as a contentious topic.
I have removed this incorrect and outdated map older then 150 years. The description of this map on Wikimedia commons clearly states: Map from late XIX century, representing a view about boundaries of Serbian empire during Stefan Dušan, about 1350. (Modern historiography has a stance that borders of Serbian empire were somewhat different. For the view of modern historiography,please see this map File:Map of the Serbian Empire, University of Belgrade, 1922.jpg, etc. Wikipedia is not a place for outdated and fringe views presented as leading theory. Jingiby (talk) 13:32, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Mauro Orbini's 'Kingdom of the Slavs' is considered a reliable source and it mentions the Serbian expansion into Bosnia. Norsx (talk) 11:25, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That sources is not always considered as reliable source. It has many dubious claims, and we have sources from 14th century that clearly show that Dusan never took anything to the east beyond Kavala. We also have no real proof that Bulgaria had any legal obligations to Serbia during Dusan's rule, as for Bosnia, Dusan never managed to take over Bosnia because he was attacked by Byzantines in the south in 1350. Serbian1331 (talk) 14:10, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
To borrow from Joy, who explained it in another TP discussion on Orbini: "Orbini lived 400 years ago and is documented to have advocated for various mythological positions. It's not a secondary source comparable to the works of numerous trained historians who've lived and died since." ౪ Santa ౪99°05:17, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Skopje was already part of the Serbian Kingdom as it was conquered by king Uros II Milutin towards the end of the 13th century. Norsx (talk) 11:32, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Biggest problem with that map is that 1331 borders are very wrong, Serbs in 1331 already had Branicevo, Kucevo, Velbazd, Uzice, Rudnik, Skoplje. Nothern border of Byzantium was Strumitsa, Prilep, Ohrid, Kruje (there were still Byzantine controlled cities until 1333-4, Kruje was taken in period of 1337-43) Serbian1331 (talk) 14:13, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I would, if possible, swap out the image of serbian medieval armour for armour that better represents the armour they had at the time the empire was actually around and not something from 2 centuries later.
Based on a previous readings on this page, lots of maps were removed because they were violating Wikipedia copy rights, this old map that stands here has a free public domain, so other editors always reverted to that map. I am not sure about this new map you've posted, if it doesn't violate any wiki rules you can maybe post it below the old map and see what happens Theonewithreason (talk) 09:15, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I am the author of that new map and I released it under a CC license, so I don't think it stands to violate any wiki rules Cattette (talk) 10:28, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It's incomprehensible for the majority of English speakers and is effectively just a big purple blob left up to interpretation. Even if it was legible I think a bit too detailed to be a infobox map. I'll attach the map in question in case anyone else is curious and wants to add their thoughts to the issue. Serbian Cyrillic mapCattette (talk) 05:41, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Biggest problem with your map is that 1331 borders are very wrong, Serbs in 1331 already had Branicevo,Kucevo, Velbazd, Uzice, Rudnik, Skoplje. Nothern border of Byzantium was Strumitsa, Prilep, Ohrid, Kruje (there were still Byzantine controlled cities until 1333-4) Serbian1331 (talk) 12:30, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Religion section: Stefan the Mighty’s attempt to unify with Rome and seek communion with the Latin Church?
I have recently added a new (sourced) map that would be way easer to read then older map from university of Belgrade that is in Serbian. I suggest that main map of the page would be new one (English) while current (Serbian Cyrillic) map would be moved to gallery bellow. Serbian1331 (talk) 21:26, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Serbian1331 (talk • contribs) 21:30, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Serbian1331, the map you provided, even thought sourced, is tehnically wrong. The way you drew the administrative divisions is not accurate, as you can't put provinces AND local lords at the same time, because it does not make sense. It would be like drawing an administrative division of modern Serbia, and you put for "Vojvodina" the name of its president. Besides, the article itself states that the empire was divided between "lands, cities, zupe and krajista (counties)". A correct map would include a three-province division, that is: "Serbian lands, Maritime lands and Greek/Roman lands" (+ cities), since that's what Dusan (and other Serbian monarchs) used in their charters. I will not remove the map, but I kindly ask to fix this innaccuracy. Norsx (talk) 20:26, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Firstly altho it was known that Dušan's state was nominaly split between newly taken (Byzantine) and old (Serbian) lands and that laws did apply differently, most historians note that this was only official and that it is very unlikely that Stefan Dusan would share power with his (still minor) son.
Now with the note of provinces, I will clerify that some provinces shown on the map (coloured same as central govenment) that were owned by central government were shown as they had notable autonomy (like lower Zeta, which was held by empress Jelena), as for the rest of internal divisions, I focused more on what nobility had within the state and to depict defacto situation within the state, which is why some nobles were governors of well defined provinces like Preljub (governor of Thessly) or Simeon (governor of Epirus), while others held several Zupas or cities like Branko Mladenovic ( who held both city of Ohrid and zupa od Drenica).
Also I would clerify that one of reasons why I posted this map is that I plan to actively update and improve the map, which would be impossible with old Serbian map from university of Belgrade, as I would note that external borders are very simplified on that map. Serbian1331 (talk) 06:46, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Even thought the division, as historian say, is nominal, I still think it would be correct to add that to the map, to show a "de iure" situation (it doesn't matter if Dusan didn't share power, the division legally existed). While I understand where you come from, I think it would be more accurate to either use a map that only shows nobility, or a map with all the zupas (which is harder since much info is missing), since a zupa was in fact held by a nobleman. Also if I may ask, are you sure that Epirus and Thessaly were formally defined regions in the empire and not modern-day terms? Norsx (talk) 10:50, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Problem with that would be that division wont depict internal situation accurately, and even we have no exact source on where exacly was nominal border between Serbian and Byzantine sides of the state, closest thing to assumption would be 1331 Serbo-Byzantine border, but that would be empty presumption.
I think I could change instead of Drenica and Ohrid being shown as seperate possesions of Mladenovici, I could depict them simply as possesions of Branko Mladenovic therefore It would show just defacto situation.
As for Epirus and Thessaly they were even seperate states and ethities post 4th crussade, Epirus being annexed by Byzantines in 1337 and then incoporated into Serbian Empire in 1347, while Thessaly had authonomy until it was integrated into Byzantium in early 14th centuary. For example during civil war in Byzantium in 1340s Thessaly had their own governor (John Angleos) until it was taken over by Dusan's general Preljub who became governor of Thessaly under Dušan. Simeon Uroš (Dušan's half brother) also became despot of Epirus in 1347. You can check out sources like John A V Fine's "Late medieval Balkans" or other authors about the subject. Serbian1331 (talk) 10:15, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I think I read on a related article that the division line was around Skoplje, but it doesn't matter. As for the accuracy of the border, keep in mind that many medieval maps (sometimes early modern too) also contain minor mistakes since we can't know every exact border. But again, it is up to you. You could also just put words in the northen part as "Serbian lands", while "Roman lands" in the south and Maritime lands on the west coast. I personally would just put the names of the nobles for every province to avoid causing confusing. Norsx (talk) 16:33, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Reason why a lot of nobility was depicted by the regional name would be as they had titles like Vojislav Vojinovic who was Duke of Hum (even tho Vojislav did not rule over Hum region) until he took Hum out of his title in late 1350s as he didnt want to be restricted to his current holdings, while others simply had titles of Duke, Sir(Gospodin) ,Despot (like for example Despot Oliver), count etc.
Eprius and Thessaly were provinces, not župas, as they were somewhat sizeable provinces in the ("Byzantine") part of the Empire, as Dušan did not change the structure much there. Župas were old slavic administrative divisions that would be better compared to counties rather then southern provinces like Epirus (that was ruled by a Despot) Serbian1331 (talk) 20:55, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I understand what you are trying to say. But I'm interesting in knowing what kind of "province" Epirus and Thessaly were. Dusan in his code said that "lands, cities and zupas/krajinas" were the official administrative division of the empire. I have a hard time trying to fit Epirus and Thessaly in these four categories. Related to this, what was the name of the "regions" ruled by Alexander Komnenos Asen and Radoslav Hlapen? Norsx (talk) 15:21, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Epirus was province governed by a Despot, Thessaly was a province ruled by Kesar, those structures were from Byzantine Empire, as I said Dusan didn't change administration much in Greek provinces, except that Greeks were forbidden from having highest positions.
For Hlapen I used the fact that his court was set in Veria, but I could change that to his name, John Kosmin Asen ruled from Valona under title of Despot. Serbian1331 (talk) 21:17, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Serbian1331 (talk • contribs) 21:30, 22 August 2024 (UTC)