Jump to content

Talk:Serbian–Hungarian Baranya–Baja Republic

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Untitled

[edit]

Why? It is about one short-lived state, while Baranja is article about one geographical region. I do not see why we should to merge this there. Besides that, this republic also included part of the Bačka region, not only Baranja. PANONIAN (talk) 18:10, 1 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please translate for a general readership

[edit]

Someone with knowledge of this subject needs to cleanup the history section. Just as an example:

Due to a miscarriage of justice Ivo Andrić was arrested some years before. Laszlo Pandurovitch certainly did not know this Pavao Keglević personally. Živko Petričić a far relative of this Pavao Keglević was the chief-negotiator of the Yugoslav peoples committee of the Croatian Parliament with the Government of Hungary. This Pavao Keglević (1911–2004) was one of the grandsons of the wholesaler of pork Franjo/Ferenc Keglević/Keglovich (1859 [baptized 1864]-1916) who in 1905 had emigrated from Hungary to Croatia and changed his name from Ferenc Keglovich to Franjo Keglević, and was at that time about 8 years old. It came to an inquiry in Hungary on this Committee of Pandurovitch, because Pandurovitch was an Austro-Hungarian officer. The members of his alleged Committee Iván Gróf Draskovich, Pál Gróf Keglevich, Tivadar Andric, Vladimir Stojcsics and Koszó Gyorgyevics were summoned, but this two alleged counts alias Draskovich and alias Keglevich quickly disappeared again, it was not established their true identity.

Although consisting of many English words punctuated with names and dates, it doesn't really make any sense. —  AjaxSmack  01:57, 18 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

8 years later (!), the confusing section has finally been deleted.--Vitriden (talk) 06:31, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
But more sections you removed, I disagree, having many sources and detailed information. It needs a cleanup.(KIENGIR (talk) 18:02, 18 August 2020 (UTC))[reply]
Addendum to your edit log: Yes, I did not check the edit history so much backwards, some few links are correct, and some references, indeed the majority is made up and reffering other wiki pages. Surely a bit "overraken" content, but could have cleanuped/or improved in a way I think.(KIENGIR (talk) 22:20, 19 August 2020 (UTC))[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Serbian-Hungarian Baranya-Baja Republic. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:46, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Talk:Serbian–Hungarian_Baranya–Baja_Republic&oldid=1212530528"